Back

AlphaFold3 predicted LWO G-protein complex from European robin features active-state biased Gα

Hungerland, J.; Kostritski, A.; Koch, K.-W.; Solov'yov, I.

2026-05-20 biophysics
10.64898/2026.05.19.726335 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Avian phototransduction and magnetoreception have been proposed to involve shared retinal proteins, including interactions between long-wavelength opsin (LWO), the cone-specific heterotrimeric G protein (Gt), and cryptochrome 4a (Cry4a), yet structural information on avian phototransduction complexes is lacking. Here we present and critically assess two atomistic models of the European robin LWO-Gt complex generated by distinct modelling strategies. A full-complex prediction using AlphaFold3 yields a tightly packed, structurally stable interface but exhibits pronounced activation-like conformational features of the Gt-subunit that persist in simulations of the isolated protein, revealing a strong bias toward the active state. In contrast, a template-guided assembly based on single-chain predictions and an experimental rhodopsin-Gt reference structure forms a weaker interface and shows no intrinsic activation bias, while still displaying subtle activation-related dynamics. These results demonstrate that machine-learned complex prediction can encode functional states independently of the local interaction environment, thereby limiting its interpretability for signalling mechanisms that hinge on activation equilibria. Our findings highlight the need for explicit assessment of conformational-state bias when modelling regulatory protein assemblies and provide a structural framework for future studies of Cry4a-dependent modulation of retinal G-protein signalling in avian magnetoreception.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.9%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
7.0%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.7%
5
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
6
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 15%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
13
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
14
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
15
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
18
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
24
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%