Back

Febuxostat enhances the anti-tumor efficacy of 2-fluoroadenine and 5-methylthioadenosine in MTAP-deleted cancer

Tang, B.; Lee, H.-O.; Krzikike, D.; Gupta, S.; Cai, K. Q.; kruger, w. D.

2026-05-21 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.19.726298 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHomozygous deletion of the methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) gene is a frequent genetic alteration in cancer. MTAP, which creates adenine from 5-methylthioadenosine (MTA), is constitutively expressed in all tissues throughout the body. Previously, we described a novel strategy to specifically target MTAP-deleted cancer cells by combining the antipurine prodrug 2-fluoroadenine (2FA) with MTA. In vitro, this combination efficiently killed MTAP- cancer cells, but in vivo the combination was much less effective in vivo. Here, we explored the role of xanthine oxidase (XO) in this process. Materials and MethodsVarious combinations of 2FA, MTA, and the xanthine oxidase inhibitor febuxostat (FX) were tested in various cancer cell lines grown in vitro and in mice. LC-MS/MS was used to examine the levels and ratio of intracellular 2-FA-containing nucleotides compared to adenine-containing nucleotides. Results and conclusionsThe treatment of cells with 2FA+MTA in vitro resulted in much higher 2FANP/ANP ratios than the same treatment in vivo. The addition of XO to culture media in vitro effectively abolished the killing by 2FA, and this effect was fully reversed by the addition of febuxostat (FX), a xanthine oxidase inhibitor. In vivo, the addition of FX to 2FA results in increased cell killing and toxicity and a 1000% increase in the amount of 2FA converted to 2-FA-monophosphate (2FAMP). Xenograft studies using MTAP- HT1080 and MiaPaCa-2 cell lines have shown that a 2FA/MTA/FX cocktail can cause tumor regression in vivo. These studies suggest that the combination of 2FA/MTA/FX should be explored as a treatment for MTAP- cancer.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.7%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.6%
3
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
4
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
5
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
6
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
8
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
18
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
19
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
22
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%