Back

Evaluation of Oxford Nanopore Sequencing for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Salmonella: Comparison with Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility in a Large-Scale Study

Hong, Y.-P.; Liao, Y.-S.; Wan, Y.-W.; Kuo, S.-C.; Teng, R.-H.; Liang, S.-Y.; Chang, J.-H.; Wei, H.-L.; Chiou, C.-S.

2026-05-19 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.19.726213 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Salmonella is a major zoonotic foodborne pathogen, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Salmonella presents a significant public health challenge. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) offers a more rapid and comprehensive method for AMR characterization compared to conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), supporting antimicrobial therapy and surveillance efforts. In this study, Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT)-based WGS was performed on 1,490 Salmonella isolates collected through nationwide surveillance in Taiwan in 2025. Genotypic resistance inferred from WGS data was compared with phenotypic AST results to assess the performance of ONT-WGS. Overall, WGS-inferred resistance showed high concordance with phenotypic resistance for most antimicrobials. However, major genotype- phenotype discordance was observed, attributed to four categories: (i) breakpoint-dependent classification, (ii) reduced or absent phenotypic expression of resistance genes, (iii) MIC modulation by ramAp, and (iv) absence of known AMR determinants. Notable discrepancies included tigecycline resistance without known genetic determinants, nalidixic acid resistance linked to ramAp-mediated MIC elevation, and a high prevalence of colistin resistance (35.4%) in S. Enteritidis without identifiable AMR determinants. Additionally, a significant proportion of ESBL- and AmpC-producing isolates were classified as susceptible or intermediate to cefotaxime and ceftazidime under CLSI criteria, highlighting the potential for misclassification and treatment failure. These findings demonstrate that ONT-WGS enables accurate, comprehensive AMR characterization, offering direct identification of AMR determinants and minimizing misclassification due to breakpoint-based AST interpretations. When interpreted appropriately, WGS can support better antimicrobial selection and serve as a valuable alternative to conventional susceptibility testing.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.5%
3
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.3%
5
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
7
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
9
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
10
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
16
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
17
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
20
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
24
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
25
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%