Back

FTO separation-of-function mutations alter m6A versus m6Am demethylation selectivity on RNA

Eluwawalage, K. D. A.; Shimanski, B.; Warminski, M.; Katta, S.; Payne, R.; Yu, Y.; Kowalska, J.; Jemielity, J.; Mugridge, J. S.

2026-05-19 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.05.19.726201 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The RNA demethylase FTO erases N6-methyladenosine (m6A) and cap-associated N6,2'-O-dimethyladenosine (m6Am) modifications. However, the molecular basis of its substrate selectivity and the biological effects of m6A versus m6Am demethylation in cells remain poorly understood. Here we report two engineered FTO separation-of-function mutants to selectively demethylate either m6A or m6Am modifications on RNA. While investigating the propensity of FTO active site residues to undergo self-hydroxylation, we found that mutations of FTO residue L203 resulted in impaired m6A demethylation but retained wild-type levels of m6Am demethylation, and that FTO L203A could function as a selective m6Am demethylase. Conversely, building on our recent work that identified conserved aromatic residues on FTO involved in mRNA 5' cap recognition, we found that the FTO H232A/W278A double mutant efficiently demethylates m6A modifications while exhibiting substantially impaired m6Am demethylation, making it a selective m6A demethylase. Together, these complementary FTO variants represent the first set of engineered mutations that shift FTO demethylation selectivity between m6A and m6Am substrates. These tools enable selective enzymatic removal of m6A or m6Am modifications in vitro for sequencing applications, and may facilitate understanding of FTO-mediated m6A versus m6Am demethylation in cellular and disease model systems.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 6%
18.3%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
14.1%
3
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
5
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.5%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.7%
9
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
11
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
12
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
13
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.7%
16
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
17
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
19
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
23
RSC Chemical Biology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
24
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%