Back

A systematic approach to understanding how patient variants affect the activity of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein

Goncalves Pinho, L.; Bezerra, M. R.; Leppert, A.; Calixto Vieira, R.; Riffelsberger, K.; Schwekendiek, J.; He, M.; Keszei, M.; Record, J.; Tedgard, U.; Kahn, F.; Sundin, M.; van de Ven, A.; Bernatoniene, J.; Ramme, K.; Palma, A.; Shcherbina, A.; Ekwall, O.; Pessoa Furtado, G.; Landreh, M.; Westerberg, L. S.

2026-05-21 immunology
10.64898/2026.05.19.726146 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) and X-linked neutropenia (XLN) are caused by genetic variants in the WAS gene. How WAS variants lead to clinical disease remains unsolved in many cases. We expressed human WASp using a spider silk inspired solubility tag (NT*-tag) and inserted patients variants. Native mass spectrometry and pyrene actin assays showed that five variants (L270P, F271S, S272P, I290T, I294T) predicted to cause XLN led to open protein conformation and high actin polymerization rate in the absence of the WASp activator, Cdc42. One previously reported XLN variant (R268W), two loss-of-function WAS variants (A236G, D485N), and one variant of unknown significance (R431W) behaved similarly to wildtype WASp in terms of structural conformation and actin polymerization. Patient CD4+ T cells were used for analysis of WASp expression and phosphorylation, actin polymerization, anti-CD3 induced proliferation capacity, and upregulation of high affinity LFA-1, distinguishing loss-of-function and gain-of-function variants from benign WAS variants. This systematic approach reveals how WAS genetic variants cause severe human disease and stratify variants to guide clinical decision for definitive therapy. Key PointsO_LIGain-of-function WASp variant has extended protein conformation probed by native mass spectrometry and raised pyrene actin polymerization. C_LIO_LIFunctional analysis of patients CD4+ T cells classifies WASp variants as loss-of-function, reduced-function, gain-of-function, and benign. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.4%
3
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
4
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
4.0%
7
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.9%
9
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
13
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
18
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Arthritis & Rheumatology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
25
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
27
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
28
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
29
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
30
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%