Back

A quantitative framework for bacterial competition during starvation

Schink, S. J.; Gerland, U. J.; Gough, Z. H.; Dauber, M.; Seyed-Allaei, H.; Biselli, E.; Brameyer, S.

2026-05-21 systems biology
10.64898/2026.05.19.726047 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacterial communities often spend long periods under starvation, where survival depends not only on their intrinsic ability to withstand stress but also on nutrients released by dying neighbors. This creates a distinct form of competition: cells compete for recycled necromass, and the outcome should depend on physiological traits that determine nutrient uptake and maintenance demand. Here, we develop a quantitative framework for this competition using Escherichia coli populations whose starvation physiology is tuned by prior growth history. Fast-grown populations have higher maintenance demands and die slightly faster in monoculture, whereas slow-grown populations are better adapted to starvation. In co-culture, these physiological differences are strongly amplified in a frequency-dependent manner: less-adapted populations die several-fold faster than in monoculture, whereas well-adapted populations can reduce their death rate below that of stationary-phase adapted monocultures. We explain these dynamics with a shared-energy-pool model in which death releases recyclable nutrients, surviving cells consume them for maintenance, and intracellular energy sets death rate. Using independently measured parameters, the model makes parameter-free predictions for competitive survival. The predicted instantaneous death rates collapse onto a universal function of the population ratio over four orders of magnitude. Our results establish necromass recycling as a quantitative basis for bacterial competition during starvation and lay the foundation for modeling communities during starvation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
21.8%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
21.8%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 12%
13.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.0%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.5%
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.5%
7
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
10
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
11
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
12
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
15
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.1%
17
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
21
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%