Back

Scalable Agricultural Microbiome Sampling: Operational Definitions, Pooling Strategies, and Preservation Methods

Ossowicki, A.; Griffioen, T.; Mileti, E.; Attanasi, V.; Hames, C.; Carrion, V. J.; Oyserman, B.

2026-05-19 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.19.725853 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Scalable soil microbiome monitoring requires sampling methods that are reproducible across operators, field sites, and logistical constraints. Here, we evaluated three key methodological choices that commonly limit comparability in agricultural rhizosphere studies: how the rhizosphere sampling unit is operationally defined, sample pooling strategies, and preservation methods. We introduce the RhizoCore, a standardized root-zone soil core defined by core diameter, depth, position relative to the plant, and subsample volume, as a practical proxy for traditional rhizosphere sampling. The RhizoCore method captured more than 92% of the sequencing depth found in traditional rhizosphere samples, with differences limited predominantly to low-abundance taxa. Preservation methods significantly affected bacterial communities, while sample pooling showed greater impact on fungal diversity and substantially reduced within-group variability across all treatments. Despite these effects, differential abundance analysis revealed minimal compositional changes, with only a small fraction of microbial taxa significantly affected by either pooling or preservation method. Our findings demonstrate that the RhizoCore method provides a reproducible, and scalable approach for rhizosphere sampling that balances scientific rigor with practical field implementation, offering a framework for large-scale soil microbiome monitoring programs and for improving comparability among agricultural microbiome studies across diverse environmental conditions.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.2%
3
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
4
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
5
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.3%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
11
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
12
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
13
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.1%
14
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
16
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
17
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
18
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
20
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Phytobiomes Journal
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
27
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%