Back

SpatialCCCbench: Standardized Metrics for the Systematic Evaluation of Spatial Cell-Cell Communication Methods

Dai, W.

2026-05-22 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.19.724475 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) enables transcriptome profiling with preserved spatial context, providing spatial dimensions that are essential for understanding complex intercellular signals in tissue architecture. ST-based CCC tools integrate spatial and molecular information to decipher intercellular interactions from a spatially informed perspective. Despite the rapid evolution of many CCC computational tools, a systematic assessment of their performance in handling ST-specific heterogeneity, utilizing spatial information efficiently, and robustness against technical or biological noise is still lacking. To address this gap, SpatialCCCbench incorporates classification accuracy, spatial signal features, robustness, and user-friendliness, aiming to guide the selection of optimal CCC inference tools across diverse spatial biology contexts. SpatialCCCbench systematically evaluates the scenario-specific applicability of ST-based CCC tools. It helps users select tools according to their analytical objectives and provides a practical benchmark for future method development. HighlightsO_LIEstablished a multi-dimensional benchmark suite to evaluate cell-cell communication (CCC) inference methods in spatial transcriptomics. C_LIO_LICharacterized the spatial patterns of CCC signals across diverse tissues using spatial autocorrelation and local diversity analysis. C_LIO_LISystematically assessed the robustness of CCC inference tools across six common experimental noise scenarios in spatial transcriptomics. C_LIO_LIIntegrated boundary-feature analysis, a mechanistically important component for biological interpretation, to uncover spatial preferences and algorithmic biases in CCC methods. C_LIO_LIProvided guidelines to assist in the selection of optimal CCC inference tools tailored to various spatial biology contexts. C_LI Graphic Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=139 SRC="FIGDIR/small/724475v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (52K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12bbc6aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5eee6borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@76d8f2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9d077e_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
25.9%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
3
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
4
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
5
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
6
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
7
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
10
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
11
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
12
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
13
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
15
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
16
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
17
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
19
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
20
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
24
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%