Enfortumab vedotin-induced cutaneous toxicities and their association with survival in urothelial carcinoma

Importance: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC). Cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) are common during EV therapy, with prior studies suggesting an association between EV-related cAEs and improved survival; however, there is insufficient data to delineate the survival benefit of EV-induced cAEs from those associated with concurrent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Objective: This study aims to evaluate the association of EV-induced cAEs and survival, and to characterize the timing and morphology of EV-induced cAEs. Design: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients with la/mUC treated with EV between 2020 and 2025. Setting: Multicenter academic referral center. Participants: A total of 449 EV-treated patients were included. Patient characteristics were extracted manually, and likelihood scoring was used to attribute cAEs to either EV or other etiologies. Exposure: EV treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: We estimated progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival using Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable time-varying and landmark Cox regression models were used to evaluate associations between EV-induced cAE and survival. Sensitivity analyses were performed at landmarks from 15 to 105 days. Results: Of 449 patients, 206 (45.9%) developed a cAE; 39 (18.9%) were high-grade and 127 (61.7%) were attributed to EV. The most common cAEs were pruritus (41.3%), unspecified and desquamating dermatitis (37.3%), and morbilliform dermatitis (27.7%). Across all treatment groups, survival was longer in patients with EV-induced cAEs. Developing an EV-induced cAE was protective across all examined landmark times, with hazard ratio (HR) 0.60 (95% CI: 0.43-0.82, p<0.001) for PFS and HR 0.46 (95% CI: 0.31-0.67, p<0.001) for OS at primary landmark time of 30 days. Early-onset EV-induced cAEs were protective at all landmark times and high-grade EV-induced cAEs were not associated with worse survival. Conclusions and Relevance: EV-induced cAEs were independently associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with la/mUC, even after accounting for immortal time bias and ICI exposure. Distinguishing EV-induced cAEs from other etiologies in timeline and morphology may help guide oncology and dermatology management.