Back

Automated quantification of cerebral microbleeds for ARIA-H monitoring in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease: A multicenter deep learning validation

Low, Z. X. B.; Rowsthorn, E.; Nazem-Zadeh, M.-R.; Francis, M.; Robb, C.; Howcroft, M.; Whiriskey, R.; Brodtmann, A.; McNeil, J. J.; Law, M.

2026-05-26 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.19.26353364 medRxiv
Show abstract

We trained a self-configuring nnU-Net model for CMB segmentation in a heterogeneous multicenter sample (n=264), including 1.5T and 3T field strengths, SWI and T2*-GRE sequences, and community and clinical cohorts. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation with a focus on object-level detection metrics. Real-world performance was evaluated on scans from an unseen dataset of people with cerebrovascular disease (n=20). The model achieved 0.82 cluster Dice, 0.88 precision, and 0.77 sensitivity on hold-out test data. Notably, the model demonstrated a low false-positive rate, averaging 0.58 false positives (FPs) per scan, an improvement on existing publicly available models. The model achieved high performance in dataset of those with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment (0.89 cluster Dice, 0.94 sensitivity), supporting its utility in clinical settings where ARIA-H monitoring is critical. In external validation, the model maintained high robustness with 0.79 sensitivity and 0.95 FPs per scan. By leveraging a heterogenous training strategy and a self-adapting architecture, we demonstrate that deep learning can achieve high-precision CMB detection that is robust to domain shifts. The low FP rate suggests this publicly available pipeline is suitable for automated screening and lesion counting in heterogenous large-scale clinical trials, reducing the burden of manual quantification.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.3%
3
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.3%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.1%
5
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
7
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
9
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.7%
16
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
19
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
20
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
26
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%