Automated quantification of cerebral microbleeds for ARIA-H monitoring in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease: A multicenter deep learning validation
Low, Z. X. B.; Rowsthorn, E.; Nazem-Zadeh, M.-R.; Francis, M.; Robb, C.; Howcroft, M.; Whiriskey, R.; Brodtmann, A.; McNeil, J. J.; Law, M.
Show abstract
We trained a self-configuring nnU-Net model for CMB segmentation in a heterogeneous multicenter sample (n=264), including 1.5T and 3T field strengths, SWI and T2*-GRE sequences, and community and clinical cohorts. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation with a focus on object-level detection metrics. Real-world performance was evaluated on scans from an unseen dataset of people with cerebrovascular disease (n=20). The model achieved 0.82 cluster Dice, 0.88 precision, and 0.77 sensitivity on hold-out test data. Notably, the model demonstrated a low false-positive rate, averaging 0.58 false positives (FPs) per scan, an improvement on existing publicly available models. The model achieved high performance in dataset of those with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment (0.89 cluster Dice, 0.94 sensitivity), supporting its utility in clinical settings where ARIA-H monitoring is critical. In external validation, the model maintained high robustness with 0.79 sensitivity and 0.95 FPs per scan. By leveraging a heterogenous training strategy and a self-adapting architecture, we demonstrate that deep learning can achieve high-precision CMB detection that is robust to domain shifts. The low FP rate suggests this publicly available pipeline is suitable for automated screening and lesion counting in heterogenous large-scale clinical trials, reducing the burden of manual quantification.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ReMiND: Recovery of Missing Neuroimaging using Diffusion Models with Application to Alzheimer’s Disease 95%
- The Spatial Patterns and Determinants of Cerebrospinal Fluid Circulation in the Human Brain 94%
- Automated quality control of T1-weighted brain MRI scans for clinical research: methods comparison and design of a quality prediction classifier 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- WMH-DualTasker: A weakly-supervised deep learning model for automated white matter hyperintensities segmentation and visual rating prediction 98%
- OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain 96%
- Evaluation of ComBat harmonization for reducing across-tracer biases in regional amyloid PET analyses 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fluid and White Matter Suppression Contrasts MRI Improves Deep Learning Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Cortical Lesions 95%
- QSMRim-Net: Imbalance-Aware Learning for Identification of Chronic Active Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on Quantitative Susceptibility Maps 94%
- Cortical thickness and grey-matter volume anomaly detection in individual MRI scans: Comparison of two methods 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.