Back

Food insecurity as a determinant of adolescent mental health in Francophone and Anglophone Africa: A multilevel analysis

Fonta, C. L.; Elgar, F.; Gordon, D.; Toumpakari, Z.

2026-05-25 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.19.26353168 medRxiv
Show abstract

Food insecurity (also called, simply, FI) levels in sub-Saharan Africa are rising among its growing adolescent population, the world's fastest-growing teenage population. This study examines food insecurity and its role as a social determinant of poor mental health among African adolescents. The study utilised the Gallup World Poll data between 2014 and 2019, including adolescents aged 15 -19 (n=25,368). Poor mental health was measured using five validated responses about negative experiences. We employed a two-level binary logistic regression model to determine the associations between food insecurity and poor mental health. At the individual level, the primary explanatory variable, food insecurity, was measured using the FAO (2015) Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES). The odds of poor mental health exhibited a dose-response relationship with food insecurity severity, with mild (OR=1.70; 95% CI (1.57-1.84), moderate (OR=2.35; 95% CI (2.17-2.54) and severe food insecurity (OR=3.19; 95% CI (2.96-3.54) being associated with poorer mental health. Other assessed covariates showed that residing in a Francophone state increased the odds of poor mental health experiences, whereas positive experiences reduced the chances of poor mental health, as did residing in rural areas. There was no difference in the relationship between mental health and food insecurity across the two colonial origins. Food insecurity remains an important determinant of adolescent mental health in Francophone and Anglophone Africa. Investing in cost-effective agricultural and nutrition-sensitive interventions that boost food production could improve adolescent mental well-being while reducing long-term social and economic burdens on families and health systems in sub-Saharan Africa.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
26.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.0%
3
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.9%
5
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
9
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
11
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
12
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
13
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
14
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
19
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
20
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
21
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
22
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%