Back

From time-course expression to gene regulation: direct linear ODE inference without finite-difference approximation

Huang, X.; Ang, A.; Vasoya, A. P.; Wang, Y.; Teresa, P.

2026-05-20 systems biology
10.64898/2026.05.18.726023 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Inferring gene regulation from time-course expression profiles is essential for understanding how cells transition between states during development, differentiation, and disease progression. Existing approaches often model expression dynamics with ordinary differential equations (ODEs). However, due to the computational complexity of directly solving these ODE models, most methods rely on finite-difference approximations of temporal derivatives, which can amplify measurement noise, introduce discretization bias, and lead to unstable or biased parameter estimates. To fill this gap, we develop the first computational method to directly learn a linear ODE model for gene regulation inference without relying on finite-difference approximations. We first formulate an optimization problem that directly exploits the closed-form solution of the linear ODE system. We then solve this problem via gradient descent, deriving analytical gradients with respect to the model parameters; these gradients involve matrix exponentials and integrals, which are challenging to directly compute. To make the computation efficient, we further use high-order Taylor approximations of the gradients whose truncation error is on the order of machine precision. In addition, we establish theoretical results demonstrating an inherent, non-vanishing gap between our exact solution and solutions derived from finite-difference approximations, which underscores the theoretical advantages of our approach. Finally, we demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms competing approaches on both simulated data and real-world scRNA-seq datasets in terms of AUROC. Our source codes can be accessed here: https://github.com/EJIUB/ExactLinearODE

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.6%
2
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.7%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.4%
4
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
4.0%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
7
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
12
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
17
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
21
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
23
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
27
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%