Back

Niche constraints drive differences between mycorrhizal fungal guilds in future range shifts

Edwards, J.; van den Hoogen, J.; Lauber, T.; Hawkes, C.; Anthony, M.; Delavaux, C.; Stewart, J.; Treseder, K.; Feng, X.; Papes, M.; Muscarella, R.; Kohout, P.; Baldrian, P.; Kiers, T.; Crowther, T.; Averill, C.; Matheny, B.; van Nuland, M.; Qin, C.; Kivlin, S.

2026-05-20 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.18.725971 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mycorrhizal fungi are a diverse and ubiquitous group of critical plant symbionts whose distribution strongly influences ecosystem function across the globe. Yet, until now, we do not have quantitative data on the range sizes of different mycorrhizal fungal taxa, limiting our capacity to forecast future shifts in community composition and function. Here, we use 121,079 DNA sequence-derived observations to map the distribution of 621 common mycorrhizal fungal taxa and forecast future changes to their range sizes. We demonstrate that climate and soil factors, particularly mean annual temperature and soil organic carbon, exert major control over mycorrhizal fungal distributions, and the ecological niches of mycorrhizal fungi consistently differ between arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal functional guilds. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal taxa generally occupy a wider niche breadth than ectomycorrhizal fungi, occurring across larger ranges of climate, soil, plant cover, topography, and disturbance conditions. Our models also predict widespread decreases in the range size of mycorrhizal fungal taxa under projected future global climates, with average ranges decreasing by 12.6% or [~]7.5 million km2. This decrease in projected range size will be most pronounced for ectomycorrhizal fungi, strongly linked to constraints from their smaller overall niches. By generating a global atlas of common mycorrhizal fungi and their associated environmental niche, we establish a critical baseline for widely suspected declines in global fungal biodiversity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.