Back

Binary partitioning of human brain organization due to divergent human cytoskeletal evolution

Rosas, N. M.; Ihnatovych, I.; Reeves, J.; Cortes Gomez, E.; Dorn, R. P.; Sandhu, H.; Szombathy, A.; Bergsland, N.; Sule, N.; Muldoon, S.; Zivadinov, R.; Szigeti, K.; Benedict, R. H. B.; Bennett, D. A.; Wang, J.

2026-05-18 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.18.725959 bioRxiv
Show abstract

CHRFAM7A is a biallelic uniquely human fusion gene present in 99.3% of humans. The direct and inverted alleles likely emerged independently in Africa and East Asia. We uncovered that the inverted allele regulates ULK4 expression through genetic epistasis. The increase in long to short ULK4 isoform ratio enhances -tubulin acetylation leading to microtubule (MT) cytoskeleton phenotypes (cell body: microtubule rich projections; neurite: de-bundling; growth cone: fanning with MT invasion). The MT cytoskeleton gain of function enhances neuronal arborization and functional connectivity in the human brain. Considering that the previously reported direct allele leads to actin cytoskeleton gain of function, we propose that CHRFAM7A alleles represent binary human genetic background through divergent evolution of the cytoskeleton. In the human brain the two alleles represent distinct brain organization: the direct allele enhances microstructure as measured by diffusion tensor imaging while the inverted allele increases functional connectivity with increased small world propensity. The two types of brain organization likely represent different susceptibility to neuropsychiatric disease and may underlie the allelic disease associations. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=195 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/725959v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (53K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a84e75org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b712d9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@367c01org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1074dc4_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.