Back

Prediction of Transcription Factor DNA Binding Affinity with High-Throughput Kd Measurements and Deep Learning

Wang, Z.; Wang, D.; Shen, K.; Luo, J.; Wang, X.; Wu, N.; Lang, Y.; Wang, X.; Ren, J.; Dong, W.; Pan, L.; Li, G.; Li, D.; Xie, C.; Zhang, Z.; Lyu, Y.; Yu, S.; Shan, L.; Zhang, N.; Yan, J.; Chen, M.; Xie, X. S.

2026-05-20 biophysics
10.64898/2026.05.18.725930 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transcription factors (TFs) regulate gene expression through specific interactions with genomic DNA. While TF binding motifs from public databases describe sequence preferences, quantifying genome-wide affinity (Kd) is highly desirable for a more accurate thermodynamic description. Here, we report ivtFOODIE (in vitro FOOtprinting with DeamInasE), an assay that leverages deaminase-mediated cytosine-to-uracil conversion to measure Kd values for a given TF across accessible genomic regions from human cells. By pre-training on TF binding sites from JASPAR and fine-tuning with our ivtFOODIE data from 46 TFs representing 13 different DNA-binding domains (DBDs), we developed Seq2Kd, a deep learning model capable of predicting a TFs absolute binding affinity on DNA sequences. Seq2Kd enables de novo motif discovery of [~]500 previously uncharacterized human TFs and reveals the effects of genetic variation both in TF-coding regions and DNA-binding sites on gene expression and disease susceptibility. By correlating predicted affinity changes with the sign and magnitude of expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) effects, we stratified TFs into activator-like and repressor-like groups. Compared to clinically benign variants, pathogenic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) within regulatory and protein-coding regions show significantly larger predicted shifts in Kd. We provide an interactive web portal, the ENcyclopedia of Transcription-factor Interactions with Regulatory Elements (ENTIRE), which integrates the Seq2Kd model with the ivtFOODIE dataset. This resource offers thermodynamic prediction for TF-DNA interactions for functional genomics and human disease.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.