Back

Residue-specific dominant-negative mutant of ubiquitin reveals functional selectivity as Ubp14 deubiquitinase inhibitor

Padhy, A. A.; Yadav, S.; Sahoo, S.; Shivani, K.; Balireddygari, L. R.; Joshi, H.; Mishra, P.

2026-05-20 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.05.18.725830 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multifunctional proteins encode specificity through nuanced molecular interactions that operate in the presence of abundant wild-type molecules. Previous studies on multifunctional proteins have shown how certain regulated interactions parse complex biological activities into discrete functional modules. Discrete interaction edges can function as regulatory nodes whose perturbations selectively remodel proteostasis output, especially under disease conditions. However, whether such interaction specificity can be harnessed to selectively manipulate functional modules and reveal residue-level control principles, remains largely unexplored. Here, we screened for dominant negative mutations that impact partner-selective functions linked to Leu8, a critical binding residue on ubiquitin. Our results reveal that the Leu8Ala mutation specifically leads to accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins and decreased levels of free ubiquitin suggesting loss of deubiquitinase function in yeast cells. Cellular and biochemical analyses establish that the Leu8Ala variant of ubiquitin specifically inhibits the yeast deubiquitinase, Ubp14, and its human homolog, USP5. We further demonstrate remodelling of the binding interface with increased interface contacts for the variant and Ubp14 complex. The variant shows a higher inhibitory potency compared to the wild-type ubiquitin and can inhibit Ubp14 both as unconjugated and as conjugated ubiquitin chain indicating the strength of its inhibitory function. Our results provide mechanistic insight into how edge perturbations in ubiquitin can reveal critical nodes that impact selective functions and thus fine-tune the cellular proteostasis network for therapeutic benefit.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.7%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.2%
4
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
9
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
10
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.9%
11
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
14
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.3%
17
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
19
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
21
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
26
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%
27
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%