Back

Patterns and predictors of domestic violence and abuse enquiry in South East London maternity settings: Cross-sectional analysis of routine electronic health record data collected between 2019 and 2023

Smeeth, D.; Keynejad, R. C.; Catalao, R.; Luck, G.; Wood, D.; Wilson, C. A.

2026-05-21 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.18.26353528 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUND: The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends routine enquiry about domestic violence and abuse (DVA) in maternity care. We aimed to explore patterns and predictors of DVA enquiry during routine first antenatal care ( booking) appointments with midwives in South East London. METHODS: We conducted an observational cohort study using cross-sectional data collected through the St Thomas Hospital midwifery service between 1st January 2019 and 31st March 2023. Pseudonymised data were extracted from maternity records, comprising demographics, mental and physical health information, social factors, and DVA enquiry. We used linear mixed modelling to test associations between predictors and DVA enquiry. RESULTS: The dataset comprised 7,932 booking appointments with 7,007 women (median age: 32 years; ethnicity: 52% White, 27% Black, 7% Asian, and 15% other). Enquiry was made about current experiences of DVA in 79.4% of appointments. Black-identifying women (OR=1.28, 95% CI [1.11,1.46]) and those born in Sub-Saharan Africa (OR=1.37 [1.14,1.64]) were more likely to be asked than white-identifying and UK-born women. Single women were more likely to be asked than married or cohabiting women (OR=1.22 [1.08,1.38]). Those living in more deprived neighbourhoods were more likely to be asked (OR=1.07 [1.01,1.14]). Multivariable modelling found that being born in Sub-Saharan Africa or Southern Europe, and living alone but with additional support were all associated with increased DVA enquiry, while being born in North America or requiring an interpreter were associated with decreased enquiry CONCLUSIONS: Despite recommendations for routine DVA enquiry during all booking appointments, a substantial proportion of pregnant individuals were not asked between 2019 to 2023. Predictors of DVA enquiry reflected practical barriers (e.g. language), and known or perceived predictors of DVA risk (e.g. deprivation). Our findings suggest that midwives consciously or unconsciously prioritise DVA enquiry for women they believe are at greatest risk, against national guidelines.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.2%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.0%
4
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
6
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
8
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
9
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
12
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
16
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
17
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
22
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
24
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
28
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
30
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%