Back

Care Delivery Outcomes of an Early Pregnancy Access Center

Mokkarala, S.; Abernathy, A.; Koelper, N.; McAllister, A.; Sonalkar, S.; Schreiber, C.

2026-05-21 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.05.18.26353517 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: To evaluate if direct access to a Pregnancy Early Access Center (PEACE) improves the timeliness and efficiency of pregnancy loss care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with EPL from January 2017 to December 2022 within a single healthcare system. We included EPL patients treated with procedural or medication management who had been assessed for a related early pregnancy complaint in the thirty days prior. The exposure was direct utilization of PEACE (yes/no) between first EPL symptom visit and EPL management. The primary outcome was "care latency" defined as days from initial presentation for concerning early pregnancy symptoms to initiation of active management. Secondary outcomes included "care continuity," the number of care teams encountered, "care efficiency," the number of patient encounters, and the type of EPL management received. Results: The evaluable cohort included 2151 individuals, with 36.5% patients of Black race and 30.3% publicly insured. A total of 885 (41.1%) received any EPL care at PEACE and 246 (11.4%) initiated their care at PEACE. Patients initiating care through PEACE experienced a 5-day reduction in care latency compared to patients who did not access PEACE. Adjusting for age, race, and insurance type, patients whose index EPL visit was with PEACE initiated their treatment twice as quickly as those who never saw PEACE (aHR 2.36 [95% CI, 2.05-2.71]). Care efficiency (median 2 [1-3] encounters) and care continuity (median 4.5 [4-7] care teams) were also improved by an index visit with PEACE when compared with controls (3 [2-4] and 6 [4-8] p<0.01), respectively). Conclusions: The Pregnancy Early Access Center (PEACE) model is associated with reduced care latency and improved efficiency and continuity when compared with routine care. PEACE reduces barriers to timely, patient-centered early pregnancy care.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.0%
2
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.0%
4
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
5
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.1%
6
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
8
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
10
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
11
Journal of Medical Economics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
12
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
13
Human Reproduction
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.0%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.7%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
18
Biology of Reproduction
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
American Journal of Psychiatry
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
23
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
24
Health Expectations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
25
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%