Care Delivery Outcomes of an Early Pregnancy Access Center
Mokkarala, S.; Abernathy, A.; Koelper, N.; McAllister, A.; Sonalkar, S.; Schreiber, C.
Show abstract
Objectives: To evaluate if direct access to a Pregnancy Early Access Center (PEACE) improves the timeliness and efficiency of pregnancy loss care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with EPL from January 2017 to December 2022 within a single healthcare system. We included EPL patients treated with procedural or medication management who had been assessed for a related early pregnancy complaint in the thirty days prior. The exposure was direct utilization of PEACE (yes/no) between first EPL symptom visit and EPL management. The primary outcome was "care latency" defined as days from initial presentation for concerning early pregnancy symptoms to initiation of active management. Secondary outcomes included "care continuity," the number of care teams encountered, "care efficiency," the number of patient encounters, and the type of EPL management received. Results: The evaluable cohort included 2151 individuals, with 36.5% patients of Black race and 30.3% publicly insured. A total of 885 (41.1%) received any EPL care at PEACE and 246 (11.4%) initiated their care at PEACE. Patients initiating care through PEACE experienced a 5-day reduction in care latency compared to patients who did not access PEACE. Adjusting for age, race, and insurance type, patients whose index EPL visit was with PEACE initiated their treatment twice as quickly as those who never saw PEACE (aHR 2.36 [95% CI, 2.05-2.71]). Care efficiency (median 2 [1-3] encounters) and care continuity (median 4.5 [4-7] care teams) were also improved by an index visit with PEACE when compared with controls (3 [2-4] and 6 [4-8] p<0.01), respectively). Conclusions: The Pregnancy Early Access Center (PEACE) model is associated with reduced care latency and improved efficiency and continuity when compared with routine care. PEACE reduces barriers to timely, patient-centered early pregnancy care.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ranked severe maternal morbidity index for population-level surveillance at delivery hospitalization based on hospital discharge data 93%
- Experience in the implementation of the early warning sign system in obstetric patients (Maternal Early Warning Criteria, MEWC) during early postpartum. A prospective observational study 93%
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives, and trainees 93%
- Out-of-hospital births and the experiences of emergency ambulance clinicians and birthing parents: A scoping review of the literature 93%
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early medical abortion using telemedicine – acceptability to patients 95%
- Should COVID-specific arrangements for abortion continue? The views of women experiencing abortion in Britain during the pandemic 93%
- The Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale: clinical considerations and comparison with other questions about pregnancy preferences 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Macrophage polarization in cesarean scar diverticulum 89%
- Clinical and laboratory characteristics in outpatient diagnosis of COVID-19 in healthcare professionals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 86%
- Lymphoid Enhancer-Binding Factor 1 (LEF1) immunostaining as a surrogate of β-catenin ( CTNNB1) mutations 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.