Back

Care Delivery Outcomes of an Early Pregnancy Access Center

Mokkarala, S.; Abernathy, A.; Koelper, N.; McAllister, A.; Sonalkar, S.; Schreiber, C.

2026-05-21 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.05.18.26353517 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: To evaluate if direct access to a Pregnancy Early Access Center (PEACE) improves the timeliness and efficiency of pregnancy loss care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with EPL from January 2017 to December 2022 within a single healthcare system. We included EPL patients treated with procedural or medication management who had been assessed for a related early pregnancy complaint in the thirty days prior. The exposure was direct utilization of PEACE (yes/no) between first EPL symptom visit and EPL management. The primary outcome was "care latency" defined as days from initial presentation for concerning early pregnancy symptoms to initiation of active management. Secondary outcomes included "care continuity," the number of care teams encountered, "care efficiency," the number of patient encounters, and the type of EPL management received. Results: The evaluable cohort included 2151 individuals, with 36.5% patients of Black race and 30.3% publicly insured. A total of 885 (41.1%) received any EPL care at PEACE and 246 (11.4%) initiated their care at PEACE. Patients initiating care through PEACE experienced a 5-day reduction in care latency compared to patients who did not access PEACE. Adjusting for age, race, and insurance type, patients whose index EPL visit was with PEACE initiated their treatment twice as quickly as those who never saw PEACE (aHR 2.36 [95% CI, 2.05-2.71]). Care efficiency (median 2 [1-3] encounters) and care continuity (median 4.5 [4-7] care teams) were also improved by an index visit with PEACE when compared with controls (3 [2-4] and 6 [4-8] p<0.01), respectively). Conclusions: The Pregnancy Early Access Center (PEACE) model is associated with reduced care latency and improved efficiency and continuity when compared with routine care. PEACE reduces barriers to timely, patient-centered early pregnancy care.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.1%
2
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
3
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
5
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.3%
8
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.8%
13
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
15
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
Journal of Medical Economics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
18
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
20
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
21
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
22
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
23
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
26
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
27
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
28
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
29
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%