Back

Urban infrastructure and spatiotemporal environmental features for EGFR-mutant lung cancer

Lu, D.; Cui, L.; Kunz, N.; Wong, M.; Tayarani, M.; Solomon, J. P.; Garcia, C. A.; Altorki, N. K.; Choi, E.; Gao, H. O.; Shieh, Y.

2026-05-21 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.18.26353481 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Lung cancer in never-smokers is rising, with a substantial proportion harboring the EGFR mutation. While fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a recognized risk factor, other intervenable pollutants and built environmental factors remain unknown. Objectives: To identify urban characteristics associated with EGFR-mutant (vs. wild-type) lung cancer using high-resolution spatiotemporal data. Methods: We analyzed 2,699 lung cancer patients with documented EGFR status treated at a high-volume academic medical center in New York City. Patient residential addresses were linked to high-resolution (300m x 300m) 5-year cumulative exposures to 3 air pollutants and 26 urban features. We developed Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) models to classify EGFR status, comparing a basic clinical model with established predictors (Asian, female, never-smoking status, and adenocarcinoma histology) to an extended model with additional urban factors. Predictive performance was assessed based on discrimination (AUC). Results: We included 2,699 patients, of whom 54.1% were female and 25.8% self-identified as Asian, 11.2% as Black, and 7.4% as Hispanic; and 29% had EGFR-mutated cancer. The extended model showed modest improvements in discrimination (AUC: 0.775 [95% CI, 0.739-0.809] vs. 0.768 [0.723-0.811]), compared to the clinical model. Newly identified factors for EGFR-mutant status included black carbon (BC), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), proximity to airports, reduced access to public transportation, elevated noise levels, and lead exposure. Conclusions: Traffic-related pollutants (BC, NO2) from diesel engines and motor vehicles, and proximity to airports, were among the novel spatiotemporal features associated with EGFR-mutant lung cancer. These results may inform policy interventions.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.8%
3
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
4
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.2%
6
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.6%
8
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
11
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
12
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 23%
2.1%
15
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
17
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Environmental Pollution
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
19
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
21
The Innovation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
24
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
25
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.9%
28
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
29
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
30
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.6%