Back

Gut microbiota signatures differentiate trajectory-defined response phenotypes and predict self-management outcomes in irritable bowel syndrome

Chen, J.; Li, A.; Wu, W.; Xu, W.; Zhao, T.; Starkweather, A. R.; Rodriguez, L.; Chen, M.-H.; Cong, X. S.

2026-05-20 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.05.18.26353470 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Heterogeneity in symptom presentation and treatment response in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remains poorly understood. The gut microbiota may contribute to this variability, but its role in shaping symptom trajectories and responses to self-management interventions is unclear. Objective: To identify symptom trajectory phenotypes and determine whether gut microbiota composition and function distinguish these phenotypes and predict multidimensional responses to pain self-management interventions in young adults with IBS. Design: Ancillary data analysis from a randomized control trial (NCT03332537). Methods: Participants with longitudinal data (n = 62) were analyzed using longitudinal k-means clustering (KML) based on trajectories of measures in IBS quality of life (QOL), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and psychoneurological outcomes (anxiety, applied cognition, depression, fatigue, global health, positive affect, and sleep disturbance) over 12 weeks. Baseline differences between clusters were assessed with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and longitudinal changes were evaluated with linear mixed models. Gut microbiota composition and predicted functional pathways were compared between phenotypes. Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) models were used to identify baseline microbial taxa and pathways predictive of longitudinal changes in QOL, BPI pain interference, and severity. Results: Two distinct trajectory-defined response phenotypes were identified: a Constrained Response Phenotype (Phenotype A, n = 35) and an Adaptive Multidomain Response Phenotype (Phenotype B, n = 27). At baseline, Phenotype B showed lower pain severity and interference, but higher levels of anxiety, depression, and fatigue compared to Phenotype A. Over 12 weeks, both phenotypes showed improvements in pain outcomes (all p < 0.05), but only Phenotype B demonstrated broad improvements across psychoneurological domains and QOL (all p < 0.05). Phenotype A exhibited more limited improvements and worsening in several psychoneurological domains. Gut microbiota functional pathways differed between phenotypes, including pathways related to xenobiotic degradation, amino acid metabolism, bile secretion, and immune-related processes (all raw p < 0.05), although these did not remain significant after multiple testing correction. Machine learning models identified distinct, phenotype-specific microbial predictors of intervention response. In Phenotype A, genera such as Alistipes and Sutterella were consistently identified across models, whereas in Phenotype B, predictors included Phascolarctobacterium, Collinsella, and Parabacteroides. Functional pathways also differed between phenotypes, suggesting distinct microbiome-linked mechanisms underlying symptom trajectories and responses to pain interventions. Conclusions: Young adults with IBS exhibit distinct multidimensional response phenotypes that are associated with differential clinical and microbiome profiles. Baseline gut microbiota composition and functional capacity demonstrate phenotype-specific predictive signatures of treatment response, supporting a microbiome-informed framework for stratifying patients and advancing personalized self-management strategies in IBS.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
4
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
9
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
18
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.0%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
22
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%