Back

CBFB mutations predict endocrine therapy benefit in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

Yaacov, A.; Passi, G.; Gillis, R.; Katz, D.; Grinshpun, A.

2026-05-21 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.18.26353467 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: Beyond estrogen receptor (ER) positivity, no genomic biomarker reliably identifies ER+ breast cancer patients who derive differential benefit from endocrine therapy (ET). We performed an unbiased genomic screen to discover genes predicting ET response and characterized the top candidate across clinical settings, treatment modalities, and an independent validation cohort. Experimental Design: We screened 240 genes in 1,197 metastatic ET-treated patients from the MSK-CHORD clinical genomics database using Cox proportional hazards regression with false discovery rate (FDR) correction. The top candidate, core-binding factor subunit beta (CBFB), was characterized across four cohorts defined by disease setting (metastatic/adjuvant) and treatment (ET/chemotherapy), with multivariable adjustment, gene-by-treatment interaction testing, left-truncation sensitivity analysis for guarantee-time bias, and external validation in METABRIC (N = 1,499 ER+). Results: CBFB mutations (prevalence, ~5%) were the only gene associated with improved time to progression (TTP). In metastatic ET patients, CBFB-mutated tumors (n = 80) demonstrated significantly longer TTP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29-0.67; P = .0002, FDR q = .010) with no chemotherapy benefit (HR, 1.16; P = .65). The gene-by-treatment interaction was significant (HR, 0.37; P = .009). Effects were robust to multivariable adjustment (HR, 0.46-0.50), independent of histology, and preserved under left-truncated Cox regression (HR, 0.38). In the adjuvant setting, CBFB mutations predicted improved recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.85; P = .010), with no effect under chemotherapy. In METABRIC, CBFB mutations predicted improved ER+ overall survival (HR, 0.52; P = 9.3e-5). Conclusions: CBFB mutations identify ~5% of ER+ breast cancers with exceptional ET benefit. As CBFB is included on all major cancer gene panels, this biomarker requires no additional testing infrastructure for clinical implementation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.3%
2
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.2%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
8
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
9
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
10
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
11
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
12
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
14
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
18
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
19
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%