Back

CBFB mutations predict endocrine therapy benefit in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

Yaacov, A.; Passi, G.; Gillis, R.; Katz, D.; Grinshpun, A.

2026-05-21 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.18.26353467 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: Beyond estrogen receptor (ER) positivity, no genomic biomarker reliably identifies ER+ breast cancer patients who derive differential benefit from endocrine therapy (ET). We performed an unbiased genomic screen to discover genes predicting ET response and characterized the top candidate across clinical settings, treatment modalities, and an independent validation cohort. Experimental Design: We screened 240 genes in 1,197 metastatic ET-treated patients from the MSK-CHORD clinical genomics database using Cox proportional hazards regression with false discovery rate (FDR) correction. The top candidate, core-binding factor subunit beta (CBFB), was characterized across four cohorts defined by disease setting (metastatic/adjuvant) and treatment (ET/chemotherapy), with multivariable adjustment, gene-by-treatment interaction testing, left-truncation sensitivity analysis for guarantee-time bias, and external validation in METABRIC (N = 1,499 ER+). Results: CBFB mutations (prevalence, ~5%) were the only gene associated with improved time to progression (TTP). In metastatic ET patients, CBFB-mutated tumors (n = 80) demonstrated significantly longer TTP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29-0.67; P = .0002, FDR q = .010) with no chemotherapy benefit (HR, 1.16; P = .65). The gene-by-treatment interaction was significant (HR, 0.37; P = .009). Effects were robust to multivariable adjustment (HR, 0.46-0.50), independent of histology, and preserved under left-truncated Cox regression (HR, 0.38). In the adjuvant setting, CBFB mutations predicted improved recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.85; P = .010), with no effect under chemotherapy. In METABRIC, CBFB mutations predicted improved ER+ overall survival (HR, 0.52; P = 9.3e-5). Conclusions: CBFB mutations identify ~5% of ER+ breast cancers with exceptional ET benefit. As CBFB is included on all major cancer gene panels, this biomarker requires no additional testing infrastructure for clinical implementation.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
50.8%
50% of probability mass above
2
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.6%
4
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
5
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
6
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.9%
8
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
9
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
10
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
12
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
13
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
14
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
15
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
16
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
18
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.6%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%
22
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%