Back

Modelling between-cell heterogeneity in within-host influenza virus infection

Yan, A. W. C.; Riley, S.; McCaw, J. M.

2026-05-18 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.17.725795 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cell tropism, or the preference of a virus for particular cell types, has major implications for viral transmission, pathogenesis, and evolution. An increase in viral fitness -- increased within-host replication, also leading to increased transmission between hosts -- can result from a virus changing its cell tropism. This is illustrated in the context of influenza, where adaptation to infect cells expressing 2-6 linked sialic acid receptors enhances human-to-human transmissibility. Target cell populations differ not only in abundance but also in intrinsic properties such as susceptibility, viral production, and interferon responses, rendering the relationship between tropism and viral fitness multi-faceted and complex. Understanding how different cell tropisms quantitatively change fitness remains an important open question in virology and quantitative biology. Here, we present a within-host mathematical model that incorporates distinct target cell types differing in key properties, and examine how cell tropism affects viral fitness, as measured by metrics such as peak viral load, infection duration, or total virus produced. Our analysis reveals that tradeoffs may arise when cell types differ by multiple characteristics. We further demonstrate that model parameters describing heterogeneity between cell types can be more accurately inferred when cell type proportions are measured alongside viral load. Our findings provide a framework for assessing the links between viral evolution, cell tropism, and within-host fitness, and motivate the design of experiments to collect quantitative data on between-cell heterogeneity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.5%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.5%
6
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
8
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
12
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
16
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
17
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.1%
19
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%