Back

Force-Gated Thrombosis (FGT): A Non-Equilibrium Mechanical Theory of Shear-Induced Blood Clot Initiation

Liu, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhuang, S.; Vigolo, D.; Yong, K.-T.

2026-05-20 biophysics
10.64898/2026.05.17.725779 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Arterial thrombosis is initiated when mechanical forces in flowing blood exceed the activation thresholds of platelets and von Willebrand factor (vWF). Despite extensive experimental characterization of shear-induced platelet aggregation, a unified theoretical framework that maps hemodynamic forcing onto clot nucleation is lacking. Here we present Force-Gated Thrombosis (FGT), a non-equilibrium mechanical theory that treats thrombus formation as a continuous phase transition driven by an effective mechanical forcing {Sigma} ={sigma} + |{nabla}{sigma}| + {beta}{varepsilon}, which combines local wall shear stress{sigma} , shear gradient |{nabla}{sigma}|, and extensional strain rate{varepsilon} . We introduce a dimensionless Thrombosis Number {Theta} = ({Sigma}/{Sigma}c)(P/P0)m(C/C0)n, which incorporates platelet concentration P and coagulation factor concentration C, and governs the transition between stable flow ({Theta} < 1) and active clot growth ({Theta} > 1). The thrombus density is represented by a scalar order parameter{varphi} whose dynamics follow a Ginzburg- Landau free energy functional. For a simplified stenosed artery we derive an analytic closed-form thrombosis onset criterion and a critical flow rate [Formula], where{delta} is stenosis severity. Linear stability analysis shows that perturbations grow at rate{omega} (k) = {Lambda}({Theta}) - D{varphi}k2, becoming unstable when {Theta} > 1. Near threshold the clot volume fraction scales as{varphi} [~] ({Theta} - 1)1/2, a mean-field critical exponent consistent with Ginzburg- Landau theory. Systematic comparison with fifteen published experimental and computational datasets spanning shear rates from 100 to 15,000 s-1 confirms that FGT correctly predicts the existence, location, and approximate severity of pathological thrombus formation across diverse vascular geometries. The theory provides a quantitative bridge between single-molecule mechanobiology and macroscale clinical thrombosis, and yields experimentally testable predictions distinguishing FGT from purely biochemical models.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.0%
4
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.1%
6
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.0%
9
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
11
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.6%
14
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
18
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
19
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
23
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%