Back

Macrophage spatial polarity to T cells predicts prognosis in young women with luminal breast cancer

Mezheyeuski, A.; Serna, G.; Martin-Bernabe, A.; Hekmati, N.; Zerdes, I.; Denes, A.; Fredholm, H.; Mauchanski, S.; Guardia, X.; Alonso, L.; De Mey, L.; Lahoutte, T.; Keyaerts, M.; Lindblad, J.; Sladoje, N.; Warnberg, F.; Sund, M.; Rask, G.; Wadsten, C.; Ponten, F.; Micke, P.; Fredriksson, I.; Nuciforo, P.

2026-05-24 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.17.26352909 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: The prognostic role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in luminal breast cancer remains uncertain, partly because density-based metrics do not capture spatial interactions between immune cell subsets. We developed a density-independent spatial metric quantifying macrophage-T cell proximity and assessed its prognostic value. Experimental Design: Using multiplex immunohistochemistry across three breast cancer cohorts (exploratory, n = 17; discovery, n = 687; validation, n = 305), we measured nearest-neighbor distances from T cells to M1-like and M2-like macrophages, benchmarked against a randomly subsampled total macrophage pool. We defined the Macrophage Spatial Polarity Index (MSPI) as the difference between M2-to-T cell and M1-to-T cell affinity scores, where higher values reflect an M2-dominated spatial phenotype. Cox regression was used to assess associations with distant disease-free survival (discovery) and overall survival (validation). Results: M2-like macrophages preferentially localized near T cells, independent of cell density. Higher MSPI was associated with shorter survival in luminal cancers (discovery: HR = 1.45, p < 0.001), with the strongest effect in young women with early-stage disease (HR = 2.16, p < 0.0001). MSPI remained independently prognostic after adjustment for stage, systemic treatment, and diagnosis period (HR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.73-3.09, p < 0.0001) and was non-significant in HER2-positive and triple-negative subtypes. Validation in an independent ER-positive cohort confirmed the finding (HR = 1.30, p = 0.004). Pooled analysis yielded HR = 2.13 (95% CI 1.68-2.70, p = 3.45 x 10-10). Conclusions: MSPI is a robust prognostic biomarker in luminal breast cancer, particularly in young women with early-stage disease, warranting further validation for risk stratification and therapeutic guidance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.8%
2
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
5
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
7
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
10
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
11
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
12
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
14
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.4%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
18
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
25
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
28
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%