Back

Macrophage spatial polarity to T cells predicts prognosis in young women with luminal breast cancer

Mezheyeuski, A.; Serna, G.; Martin-Bernabe, A.; Hekmati, N.; Zerdes, I.; Denes, A.; Fredholm, H.; Mauchanski, S.; Guardia, X.; Alonso, L.; De Mey, L.; Lahoutte, T.; Keyaerts, M.; Lindblad, J.; Sladoje, N.; Warnberg, F.; Sund, M.; Rask, G.; Wadsten, C.; Ponten, F.; Micke, P.; Fredriksson, I.; Nuciforo, P.

2026-05-24 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.17.26352909 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: The prognostic role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in luminal breast cancer remains uncertain, partly because density-based metrics do not capture spatial interactions between immune cell subsets. We developed a density-independent spatial metric quantifying macrophage-T cell proximity and assessed its prognostic value. Experimental Design: Using multiplex immunohistochemistry across three breast cancer cohorts (exploratory, n = 17; discovery, n = 687; validation, n = 305), we measured nearest-neighbor distances from T cells to M1-like and M2-like macrophages, benchmarked against a randomly subsampled total macrophage pool. We defined the Macrophage Spatial Polarity Index (MSPI) as the difference between M2-to-T cell and M1-to-T cell affinity scores, where higher values reflect an M2-dominated spatial phenotype. Cox regression was used to assess associations with distant disease-free survival (discovery) and overall survival (validation). Results: M2-like macrophages preferentially localized near T cells, independent of cell density. Higher MSPI was associated with shorter survival in luminal cancers (discovery: HR = 1.45, p < 0.001), with the strongest effect in young women with early-stage disease (HR = 2.16, p < 0.0001). MSPI remained independently prognostic after adjustment for stage, systemic treatment, and diagnosis period (HR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.73-3.09, p < 0.0001) and was non-significant in HER2-positive and triple-negative subtypes. Validation in an independent ER-positive cohort confirmed the finding (HR = 1.30, p = 0.004). Pooled analysis yielded HR = 2.13 (95% CI 1.68-2.70, p = 3.45 x 10-10). Conclusions: MSPI is a robust prognostic biomarker in luminal breast cancer, particularly in young women with early-stage disease, warranting further validation for risk stratification and therapeutic guidance.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.8%
2
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
4
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
6
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
7
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.6%
9
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
10
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
12
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.1%
14
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
15
Oncogene
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
19
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.0%
24
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%