Back

Efficacy Validation of a Novel MRI-Based Whole-Body Rapid Bone Scan (WB-RBS) Strategy for Diagnosing Bone Metastases: A Prospective Trial

Wu, X.; Zhang, J.; He, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Kang, X.; Hu, W.; Li, Y.; Ma, H.; Wang, Y.; Song, Y.; Chen, X.; Huo, F.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, H.; Xi, Y.

2026-05-24 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.17.26352855 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Traditional bone scintigraphy for detecting malignant bone metastases is limited by suboptimal accuracy and radiation exposure. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI), while an alternative, requires lengthy scan times and high patient compliance. Purpose: To develop a novel, rapid whole body bone screening (WB-RBS) MRI protocol and evaluate its diagnostic performance for bone metastasis detection. Materials and Methods: Patients with pathologically confirmed malignancies and healthy controls were prospectively enrolled. All participants underwent WB-RBS (acquisition time: about 10 min); patients additionally underwent WB-MRI (about 70 min). Three radiologists, blinded to clinical data, independently evaluated the images for bone metastases. A consensus expert diagnosis served as the reference standard to calculate the diagnostic performance of WB-RBS. Specificity was further assessed in the healthy control group. Results: Seventy patients and 19 healthy controls were included. WB-RBS demonstrated excellent inter-reader agreement at the patient level. Compared with the reference standard, WB-RBS achieved an accuracy of 77.1%-91.4% at the patient level and a slightly lower accuracy (70.6%-82.5%) at the lesion level. At diagnostic confidence thresholds 1-3, the correlations between WB-RBS ratings and the reference standard were statistically significant for both patient- and lesion-level analyses. Conclusion: WB-RBS showed favorable inter-reader agreement and high accuracy for bone metastasis screening at the patient level, while substantially reducing scan time and cost. Its rapid, radiation-free nature and high accessibility offer distinct clinical advantages, supporting its potential as an alternative screening tool to conventional bone scintigraphy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
3
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
5
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
7
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
8
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
JBMR Plus
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
25
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%