Back

Nearest Neighbor Parameters for Estimating the Folding Stability of RNA Including Pseudouridine

Shabangu, T. S.; Kierzek, E.; Arteaga, S.; Orf, G. S.; Stone, J.; Hiltke, O. M.; Miaro, M.; Jolley, E. A.; Soszynska-Jozwiak, M.; Szabat, M.; Aviran, S.; Bevilacqua, P. C.; Znosko, B. M.; Kierzek, R.; Mathews, D. H.

2026-05-17 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.05.16.725682 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nearest neighbor parameters are widely used in software for estimating the conformational stability of an RNA sequence folding into a specific structure. Folding stability for RNA with canonical nucleotides A, C, G, and U has been widely studied, but the same is not true for most modified nucleotides. In this work, we present a comprehensive set of nearest neighbor parameters for estimating the folding stability of RNA including pseudouridine in helical or loop contexts. These parameters are derived from 210 optical melting experiments involving helices with pseudouridine-A and pseudouridine-G pairs and with pseudouridine in loop motifs. The experiments include sequences with pseudouridine and U in the same strand, including U-A and U-G pairs, allowing us to consider the folding stability of sequences with both U and pseudouridine. On average, pseudouridine stabilizes RNA folding compared to U in an analogous motif, although this effect is sequence-context dependent. These parameters improve the modeling of folding stability for RNA secondary structures containing pseudouridine. We demonstrate that these parameters successfully model the secondary structure change for Saccharomyces cerevisiae U2 snRNA when two additional inducible pseudouridines are present. These parameters are freely available and incorporated into the RNAstructure software package. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=81 SRC="FIGDIR/small/725682v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (14K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e1167aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18ac7f0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4c909eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@aa8bca_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
17.0%
2
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.0%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.0%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
6
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
8
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
9
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
10
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
11
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
12
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
14
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
16
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%