Back

Body size and cranial shape differentiation in urban and rural house mice (Mus musculus domesticus)

Kupchella, S. C.; Kort, A. E.; Phifer-Rixey, M.

2026-05-16 zoology
10.64898/2026.05.16.725634 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cities are characterized by elevated temperatures, increased pollution, and high-density human populations which often are accompanied by changes in available resources, like food. These shifts have the potential to drive phenotypic divergence in urban wildlife. Functional morphological traits, like body size, can mediate interactions between wildlife and habitat and are closely tied to life history and fitness. While examples of functional morphological variation associated with urbanization are increasing, variation in such traits as a response to urbanization remains unexplored for most taxa. Here, we investigated morphological divergence between urban and rural populations of house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). House mice are globally distributed in diverse habitats and are a model system with a wealth of phenotypic data, making them useful for the study of the impacts of urbanization on morphology. Using a paired replicate design, we sampled urban and rural populations in three distinct metropolitan regions in the eastern United States. We found that body size was smaller in urban populations. Using 3D geometric morphometrics, we also analyzed variation in cranial shape across habitats. Differences in cranial shape were largely allometric, that is, driven by differences in body size. However, we also uncovered evidence of cranial shape variation between habitats not explained by size. In contrast, we did not find evidence for habitat-driven differences in cranial capacity independent of size. Overall, our results suggest a key role for body size in mediating morphological responses to urbanization and highlight the potential of house mice as a globally-distributed model for urbanization.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
2
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
3
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.9%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.9%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.5%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
7
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
10
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
11
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
15
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
16
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
19
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
20
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
21
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
22
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
23
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
24
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
25
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
26
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
27
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%