Back

Influenza virus Non Structural protein 1 (NS1) Chaperones Nucleoprotein (NP) Oligomerization to Coordinate Ribonucleoprotein Assembly and Genome Replication

Das, S.; De, A.; Bhattacharya, P.; Munshi, A.; Kumari, P.; Samanta, D.; Mondal, A.

2026-05-18 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.05.16.725629 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Influenza virus nucleoprotein (NP) co-transcriptionally enwraps viral genomic/antigenomic RNAs to assemble viral ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs), while the non-structural protein-1 (NS1) is classically recognized as an antagonist of host antiviral responses. Although NP-NS1 interaction has long been reported, the molecular basis of this protein-protein interaction and its relevance in the virus life cycle remain elusive. Here, we define the NP-NS1 interaction interface and uncover a noncanonical role of NS1 in regulating RNP assembly and viral genome replication. Using integrated biochemical, biophysical, and structural analyses, we demonstrate that the RNA-binding domain (RBD) of NS1 directly engages the NP tail-loop, conferring high affinity for monomeric NP. Functional assays reveal that a cytoplasm-restricted NS1 variant acts as an NP-specific chaperone by stabilizing monomeric NP through sequestration of its intrinsically flexible tail-loop and by scaffolding NP-NP interactions. During influenza virus infection, phosphorylation at the homotypic interface restricts NP in a replication-competent monomeric state. Cytoplasmic NS1 recruits these phosphorylated monomeric NPs into assembling RNPs, thereby facilitating viral genome replication and virus propagation. Collectively, our findings establish NS1 as a selective cytoplasmic chaperone of NP and reveal a novel regulatory axis governing influenza virus RNP biogenesis and replication.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.