Back

Computational Design of Novel Selective Phosphodiesterase 4B Inhibitors from Natural Products: An Integrated Machine Learning and Structure-Based Drug Discovery Approach

Oni, S. A.; Oyemomi, M. D.; Osho, A.; Abdulfatai, A.

2026-05-19 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.16.725619 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Selective inhibition of phosphodiesterase 4B (PDE4B) remains a promising strategy for preserving the anti-inflammatory benefit of PDE4 inhibition in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease while reducing PDE4D-associated tolerability liabilities. This study integrated SHAP-interpretable machine learning, natural product virtual screening, hierarchical docking, post-docking MM-GBSA, isoform cross-docking, binding-pocket comparison, ADMET prediction, and 100 ns molecular dynamics simulations to identify PDE4B-selective inhibitors from the LOTUS natural product database. A Random Forest classifier trained on curated ChEMBL PDE4B bioactivity data achieved an external performance with AUC-ROC = 0.955, accuracy = 0.893, F1-score = 0.896, MCC = 0.785, and prioritized 119,698 predicted actives from 276,518 LOTUS compounds. SHAP analysis identified BertzCT and TPSA as major contributors to predicted activity. Sequential Lipinski, PAINS, and QED filtering retained 14,210 candidates for structure-based evaluation. Extra precision docking identified four leads with PDE4B docking scores of -9.123 to -12.080 kcal/mol, all outperforming roflumilast (-7.658 kcal/mol). Cross-docking and post-docking MM-GBSA supported preferential PDE4B binding for three candidates. The top lead, LTS0048837, maintained a stable PDE4B-bound pose during simulation, with comparatively stronger interaction persistence than its PDE4D complex and the roflumilast reference. These findings nominate LTS0048837 as a computationally prioritized PDE4B-selective natural product lead requiring experimental enzyme, cellular, and pharmacokinetic validation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
23.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.1%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.5%
5
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
7
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
11
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
12
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
13
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
14
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
16
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
19
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Advanced Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
25
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%