Back

Optogenetic cochlear stimulation evokes midbrain activity with near-physiological temporal fidelity

Koert, E.; Götz, J.; Albrecht, N.; Vavakou, A.; Wolf, B. J.; Moser, T.

2026-05-19 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.16.724905 bioRxiv
Show abstract

When hearing fails, stimulation of the auditory nerve by electrical cochlear implants (eCIs) partially restores hearing, with most eCI users achieving open speech understanding. However, the broad current spread from each electrode limits frequency coding and speech understanding in daily situations with background noise. Spatially confined optogenetic stimulation by future optical cochlear implants (oCIs) improves frequency coding but millisecond closing kinetics of channelrhodopsins (ChRs) might limit temporal coding. Here, we evaluated the utility of fast-closing ChR f-Chrimson for processing temporal information in the auditory system of Mongolian gerbils. We recorded neural activity in the inferior colliculus evoked by f-Chrimson-mediated optogenetic stimulation of the cochlea. F-Chrimson enabled energy-efficient stimulation of the auditory pathway at rates [≥]150 Hz, outperforming the slower ChR variants CatCh (blue) and ChReef (green). Energy thresholds for activation of the auditory pathway were in the low {micro}J range, between ChReef (sub-{micro}J) and CatCh. Dynamic range and frequency selectivity were comparable to previous observations with CatCh and outperformed electrical stimulation. In conclusion, employing fast-gating ChRs harnesses improved spectral coding without degrading temporal coding. The Paper ExplainedO_ST_ABSProblemC_ST_ABSElectrical cochlear implants (eCIs) partially restore speech comprehension in most of 1 million otherwise severely deaf people. However, most CI-users face challenges hearing in daily situations. Spectrally more selective stimulation of the auditory nerve by optical cochlear implants (oCIs) promises to overcome this limitation. However, the closing kinetics of channelrhodopsins (ChR) limit the temporal bandwidth of bionic sound coding. Improving the ChR properties and evaluating temporal coding remain major objectives for developing hearing restoration by oCI. ResultsHere, we evaluate the utility of waveguide-based oCI using the fast-closing ChR Chrimson (f-Chrimson) for encoding of temporal, spectral and intensity information by multi-electrode-array (MEA) recordings from the midbrain. We compare f-Chrimson-mediated bionic coding to acoustic coding as well as to previous data acquired with optogenetic stimulation using other ChRs and with electrical stimulation. F-Chrimson enabled energy-efficient stimulation of the auditory pathway at rates [≥]150 Hz, outperforming the slower ChR variants CatCh (blue) and ChReef (green). Intensity and frequency coding were comparable to previous observations with CatCh and outperformed electrical stimulation. ImpactThis study demonstrates near physiological temporal coding with the fast-closing ChR f-Chrimson, indicating that improved spectral coding by oCI is not traded off by poor temporal fidelity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.8%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 10%
14.5%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
5
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
8
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.9%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.9%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
13
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
15
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
16
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Current Research in Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.6%
26
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.5%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.5%
29
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%