Back

Long-distance dispersal drives global tropical distributions in a widespread moth lineage (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae)

Taberer, T. R.; Espeland, M.; Martin, S.; Coulson, T.; Clegg, S. M.

2026-05-18 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.16.724310 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how global biodiversity patterns arise is a central theme of biogeography, with contemporary theory recognising the roles of both dispersal and vicariance. Genera that are broadly distributed can provide important systems for disentangling the relative influence of these processes across evolutionary timescales. However, many lesser-studied groups, particularly those in the tropics, lack a densely sampled phylogeny which hinders robust inference of their evolutionary and biogeographic history. This study investigates the global diversification and systematics of the putative pantropical moth genus Parasa Moore (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae), with the aim of assessing the relative importance of dispersal and vicariance in shaping its distribution. Medium-coverage whole genome sequencing of specimens predominantly from museum collections were used to generate a globally sampled time-calibrated phylogeny of Parasa and associated genera (the Parasa-complex). Ancestral range estimation analyses were employed to infer geographical origins and possible dispersal times between bioregions. The Parasa-complex originated in Africa in the late Oligocene ([~]24 Ma) and, through a series of long-distance dispersal events during the early-mid Miocene, expanded into Asia ([~]23 Ma) and the Americas ([~]21 Ma). Across all regions, dispersal was the dominant process shaping present-day distributions, with a limited role of vicariance in some subregions. Phylogenetic analyses further demonstrated that Parasa is not monophyletic, with multiple independent lineages contributing to its apparent pantropical distribution. These findings highlight a central role of long-distance dispersal in generating certain global distributions. The results support a dynamic model of range evolution involving rapid Miocene dispersal and subsequent regional diversification. In addition, the non-monophyly of Parasa requires substantial taxonomic revision, underscoring the importance of robust phylogenetic frameworks for interpreting global biodiversity patterns.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.8%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
3
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.7%
5
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.7%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 18%
4.7%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.5%
12
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
13
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.3%
16
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
17
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
18
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
21
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
24
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
28
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%