Back

Aldosterone-targeted Therapy after Primary Aldosteronism Testing in Resistant Hypertension: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Tsai, C.-H.; Chang, Y.-C.; Chang, C. C.; Chang, Y.-Y.; Chen, U.-L.; Chueh, J. S.-C.; Brown, J.; Wu, V.-C.; Lin, Y.-H.; Vaidya, A.

2026-05-20 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.16.26353384 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Primary aldosteronism (PA) testing is recommended for patients with resistant hypertension but remains underused, and evidence linking aldosterone-targeted therapy to improved cardiovascular and renal outcomes is limited. Methods: In a nationwide cohort of patients with resistant hypertension between 2001 and 2022, we assessed PA testing and subsequent mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use and adrenalectomy. Among tested patients, time-dependent Cox models were used to assess associations between treatment exposure and mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and renal outcomes. Results: Among 254,338 patients, only 2.0% were tested for PA. Tested patients had a higher prevalence of hypokalemia and cardiometabolic comorbidities. In the overall tested population, MRA use was not associated with lower risks of cardiovascular or renal outcomes. However, when testing resulted in an established PA diagnosis, the use of both MRA (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.86) and adrenalectomy (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.20-0.54) were associated with a reduced risk of MACE compared with no aldosterone-targeted therapy. Similar results were observed regarding mortality. Adrenalectomy was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.30-0.99), all-cause mortality (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.93) and renal outcomes (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.80) compared with MRA in patients with a diagnosis of PA. Conclusions: PA remains markedly underrecognized in resistant hypertension. Among patients with resistant hypertension who did undergo PA testing with establishment of a PA diagnosis, aldosterone-targeted therapy resulted in lower risk of adverse cardiorenal outcomes and death when compared to conventional antihypertensive therapy.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.0%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.1%
4
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
8
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
10
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
11
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
12
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
14
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
28
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%