Back

Diet alters epidemic size and timing in a trophically-transmitted parasite

Jiranek, J.; Motter, A.; Channamraju, N.; Huang, E.; Batterton, T.; Gibson, A. K.

2026-05-19 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.15.725575 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A hosts diet can alter the course of parasite infection. This is especially true of trophic parasites, which a host acquires through feeding. While a large body of work attests to the role of diet in the spread of disease within-hosts, diet can also impact host density and encounter rate with parasites, both of which are expected to modify disease dynamics. When parasites are acquired through feeding, epidemics may be larger and more severe on high-quality diets if these diets support a higher density of hosts that feed more and thus ingest more parasites. Alternately, epidemics may be more severe on low-quality diets if malnourishment decreases hosts ability to resist disease. To differentiate these hypothesized effects of diet on disease, we quantified individual infections and epidemic dynamics for the natural microsporidian parasite Nematocida ironsii infecting its nematode host Caenorhabditis elegans. We measured feeding rate, parasite transmission, and host fitness across three bacterial diets that vary in quality and elicit distinct feeding behaviors in C. elegans. We found that low-quality diets reduced feeding rate, which corresponded to reduced acquisition of parasite spores. However, these diet-mediated differences in parasite acquisition did not directly map onto fitness consequences: hosts eating the poor-quality diet had similar reductions in fitness to those on higher quality diets. During epidemics, a combination of increased parasite acquisition and higher population growth rates resulted in higher parasite abundance for hosts on high-quality diets. Our work underscores the importance of considering both individual- and population-level impacts acting in concert to determine how diet affects the spread of infectious disease.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.8%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.1%
3
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
4
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.6%
5
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.6%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.0%
7
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
8
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.4%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.1%
12
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.9%
13
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.3%
15
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
16
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
17
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.4%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.4%
21
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
23
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
24
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
25
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Parasitology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
30
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%