Back

Canavanine-based assay for gross chromosomal rearrangements reveals genome instability hotspots and modulating genes in fission yeast

Ait Saada, A.; Ollivier, C.; Costa, A. B.; Moreau, K.; Lambert, S. A. E.; Lobachev, K. S.

2026-05-16 genetics
10.64898/2026.05.15.725498 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract/SummaryGross chromosomal rearrangements are a hallmark of many diseases and cancers. The study of their biogenesis and the mechanisms underlying their formation is greatly facilitated by the availability of genetic reporter assays in model organisms. We present here a novel GCR assay developed in fission yeast, a highly relevant model for understanding genome instability related to human biology. The reporter employs canavanine counter-selection to detect GCRs within a chromosomal context. Using this assay, we identified natural hotspots for GCRs, including inverted long terminal repeats (IR-LTRs). Structural analysis of GCR events showed that IR-LTR-induced GCRs mainly result in either terminal deletions with adjacent inverted duplications or repair via long-range break-induced replication (BIR). Deleting IR-LTRs reduces the GCR rate and reveals another hotspot driven by BIR between homeologous aldo/keto reductase genes on opposite arms of chromosome I. This is the first evidence that BIR can occur in S. pombe on long tracks reaching up to 600 kb. Besides highlighting genome rearrangement hotspots, the assay also identifies regulators of genome instability in fission yeast. Loss of Nup132, a component of the nuclear pore complex, increases IR-LTRs-induced GCRs, while the budding yeast homolog Nup133 has no effect on the stability of a structurally similar IR. In contrast, disrupting djc9, which encodes a conserved histone H3-H4 binding protein, decreases GCR rates. Overall, this sensitive GCR assay enables the identification of factors that control spontaneous and fragile motif-induced chromosomal instability, including those conserved in humans but lost through evolution in other organisms.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.0%
2
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
14.0%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.7%
6
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.5%
8
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
9
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.8%
12
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
16
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
19
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
EMBO Reports
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
23
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%