Back

Selection For Yield Enhanced Rhizobial Mutualism In Pea

Porter, S.; Millar, N.; Coyne, C.

2026-05-18 plant biology
10.64898/2026.05.15.725492 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Crop improvement can enhance food security, but side effects, such as trade-offs between valuable agronomic traits, are common. Likewise, fertilisation helps ensure high yields, but can devalue mutualisms with soil microbes that would otherwise be essential for nutrient acquisition. If the need for nutritional mutualisms is reduced in crops, mutualisms could be disrupted by selection relaxation or allocation trade-offs. Thus, crops could achieve high yields in spite of, or because of, disruption of nutritional mutualisms. Alternatively, the highest-yielding plants might flourish because they maximise nutrient acquisition from both symbionts and the soil. Here, enhanced mutualism could evolve over the course of agricultural crop improvement. To investigate whether high yields in cultivars and wild accessions are negatively or positively genetically correlated with outcomes in the legume-rhizobia mutualism, we measured whether yield and symbiosis traits trade-off or are positively genetically correlated among cultivars and wild accessions. We also tested whether this relationship differs between accessions released before or after 1950. We measured genetic correlations between yield and mutualism traits in 87 domesticated pea (Pisum sativum) accessions in a common garden agricultural field across three years. Seed yield and N2 fixation (%Ndfa) were positively genetically correlated. While N fixation was more strongly predictive of yield in the pre-1950 accessions than the post-1950 accessions, the underlying positive genetic correlation between the traits did not differ between the groups. The positive genetic correlation between yield and N2 fixation indicates that selection to increase yields has maintained or increased the benefits of the rhizobial mutualism in pea. Our findings predict that breeding to increase yield may continue to produce pea cultivars that get a greater proportion of their N from rhizobia, enhancing symbiotic mutualism and reducing the proportion of N supplied by fertilisation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.5%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.8%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.3%
6
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
8
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
17
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
20
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
23
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
26
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%