Back

Population genomics of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in Anopheles funestus reveals rapid evolution of the α9 and β2 subunits within a constrained gene family

Rios, D.; Fouet, C.; Kamdem, C.

2026-05-16 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.15.725454 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The deployment of clothianidin-based insecticide formulations in malaria vector control has highlighted the capacity of Anopheles funestus to displace more susceptible mosquito species in treated areas and to rapidly evolve resistance under selection pressure. Metabolic detoxification, together with structural and genetic changes in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), the primary molecular targets of neonicotinoids, can reduce insecticide efficacy. Here, we characterized amino acid substitutions across all 11 nAChR subunits in An. funestus to assess standing variation that may facilitate adaptive responses to chemical exposure. Using whole-genome sequencing data from 656 mosquitoes sampled in 13 African countries, we found marked contrasts in the distribution of nonsynonymous variants among nAChR subunits. Most subunits are strongly constrained and carry no missense variants, whereas two loci (3 and 7) display three geographically widespread amino acid substitutions across the continent. In contrast, 9 and {beta}2 accumulate dozens of nonsynonymous mutations occurring at intermediate to high frequencies, including within domains involved in orthosteric ligand binding and channel gating. Genetic differentiation at nAChR loci among populations from different countries is low to moderate, although several nonsynonymous mutations display high FST values consistent with geographic structuring. These results highlight relaxed constraint on two subunits that may provide opportunities for evolutionary diversification within a conserved family of multimeric receptor assemblies. Such diversification has not been observed in vector species displaced by An. funestus in indoor residual spraying areas, and the potential implications for reduced sensitivity to neonicotinoids are discussed.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.5%
2
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.0%
3
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.1%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.1%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
7
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
8
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.0%
11
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
16
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
20
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
21
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
24
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%