Back

Bandwidth-aware fusion of resting-state EEG-fMRI connectivity in cortical eigenmode space

Park, H. G.

2026-05-19 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.15.725408 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We introduce a geometry-informed, bandwidth-aware model for fusing resting-state EEG and fMRI connectivity by treating each modality as a masked, physics-limited observation of a shared latent cortical connectivity structure. Both modalities are represented in a shared cortical Laplace-Beltrami (LB) eigenmode basis that provides an anatomically grounded ordering of spatial scales. In this coordinate system, fMRI constrains connectivity across a broad range of spatial scales but only at slow timescales, whereas EEG provides frequency-resolved information primarily for coarse spatial modes. We formalize this complementarity through a latent spatio-spectral connectivity object and estimate it using a low-rank factorization with shared eigenmode-network factors and subject- and frequency-specific nonnegative strengths. Estimation is driven by the regions supported by each modality (EEG: coarse spatial modes across broad frequencies; fMRI: broad spatial modes at low frequencies), while unobserved bands are inferred through shared low-rank structure and spectral smoothness regularization. In the MPI-LEMON cohort, the fused representation yields compact, interpretable subject features (fMRI network strengths and EEG oscillatory summaries) that support out-of-sample age prediction under nested cross-validation, and coherent multi-view interpretation through cortical maps, spectral profiles, and atlas-referenced system composition summaries. These results demonstrate that explicitly modeling modality-specific bandwidth gaps enables principled EEG-fMRI connectivity fusion and provides a practical route to multimodal network biomarkers for individual-differences research.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.