Back

Automated robotic control system for EEG-BCI-guided closed-loop TMS

Matsuda, R. H.; Makkonen, M.; Zubarev, I.; Kahilakoski, O.-P.; Kinnunen, L. A.; Nurminen, M.; Simonaho, S.-P.; Ilmoniemi, R. J.; Souza, V. H.; Lioumis, P.

2026-05-19 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.15.725366 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Brain-state-guided and closed-loop transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocols have emerged as methods for decreasing the variability and increasing the therapeutic effectiveness of stimulation protocols. However, most existing brain-state-dependent TMS systems only control the timing of stimulation, while the location is fixed and manually adjusted between blocks or sessions. This limits flexible targeting of distributed networks. We developed a system that jointly manages TMS pulse timing and location automatically controlled by an electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain- computer interface (BCI). A machine-learning algorithm infers the brain state in real time to guide the robotic coil placement and target. We present a proof-of-concept study in which a BCI controlled both the target site and the timing of TMS. A pre-trained convolutional neural network discriminated between resting state and movements performed with the right or left hand; the classifier output determined the hemisphere in which primary-motor-cortex hand area was stimulated and when. Preprocessing and decoding of 2-s EEG segments required 150 ms, and the robot took 7.5 s to move from the vertex home position to the predefined motor targets. The EEG-BCI-guided robotic TMS system expands the toolkit for brain-state-dependent and closed-loop neurostimulation by enabling control of stimulus location based on volitional brain activity. Thus, the system can benefit both neuroscience research and clinical neuromodulation applications. A prominent application of the system is automatically controlling spinal cord injury or motor disorder TMS rehabilitation with motor imagery, optimizing stimulation timing to the brain state producing optimal rehabilitation results.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.3%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.5%
3
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
5
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
6
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
8
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.0%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
16
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
17
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.3%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
21
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
24
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
25
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
26
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
29
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%