Back

Omics analysis of MRSA under antibiotic stress identifies conserved adaptive modules and candidate adjuvant targets

Rosado, P. C.; Pinheiro, P. F.; Marques, M. M.; Justino, G. C.

2026-05-16 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.15.725322 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) survives antibiotic exposure through coordinated physiological adaptation that extends beyond canonical resistance determinants. Here, we used an untargeted multi-omics strategy integrating proteomics, post-translational modifications, and metabolomics to characterize MRSA ATCC 43300 responses to five mechanistically distinct antibiotics: ampicillin, methicillin, vancomycin, chloramphenicol, and ciprofloxacin. Cells were exposed to 0.5x, 1x, and 2x IC50, enabling comparison of graded stress responses across antibiotic classes. Across treatments, MRSA did not deploy fully distinct drug-specific programs. Instead, antibiotic exposure repeatedly converged on a limited set of conserved adaptive modules detectable across independent molecular layers. These included coupling of envelope stress with genome maintenance, recurrent remodeling of metal/cofactor and redox homeostasis, sustained pressure on nucleotide and folate metabolism, and reprogramming of transport and surface-associated functions. A particularly robust cross-antibiotic signature was the accumulation of MoO2-molybdopterin cofactor. Ciprofloxacin additionally induced compensatory envelope reinforcement, supporting tight coupling between DNA damage responses and cell-envelope maintenance. Overall, the data support a unified model in which MRSA buffers mechanistically distinct antibiotic stress through a compact set of conserved stress-response functions rather than through entirely separate adaptive programs. These recurrent modules highlight candidate adjuvant vulnerabilities, particularly in metal/cofactor handling, nucleotide supply and repair, and transport/envelope compensation pathways. As this was an exploratory design intended to identify candidate adaptive patterns, these vulnerabilities now require validation in biologically replicated cultures and targeted functional studies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 4%
22.2%
2
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
14.2%
3
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.2%
7
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.1%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.8%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.5%
10
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
11
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.0%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
13
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
15
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Science Signaling
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
21
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
22
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%