Back

Engineering Endogenous T Cell Receptors to Recognize Cancer Neoantigens Using a Hybrid Physics-AI Approach

Weber, J.; Parajuli, G.; Wang, S.; Ratner, V.; Ma, X.; Shoshan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Morrone, J.; Raboh, M.; Hexter, E.; Parthasarathy, P. B.; Gaughan, C.; Makarov, V.; Chu, L.; Hasgur, S.; Juric, I.; Diaz, M.; Srivastava, R.; Knauf, J.; Hassan, K.; Cornell, W.; Alban, T.; Chan, T.

2026-05-19 immunology
10.64898/2026.05.15.725176 bioRxiv
Show abstract

T cell receptors (TCRs) are critical for immune surveillance and successful adaptive immune response against foreign antigens. TCRs drive this key arm of the immune system through recognition of peptide epitopes presented on MHC complexes. However, they are limited due to their stochastic nature and generation via genetic recombination. In silico design of functional TCRs that target defined peptide epitopes would be of considerable utility but has up until now been unsuccessful. Here, we develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered approach using a hybrid physics-based simulation and generative AI that successfully engineers TCRs against defined epitopes presented by MHC-I. We use this approach to design TCRs against two cancer antigens, a HERC1 neoantigen and an immunogenic neoepitope in mutant EGFR. We engineer multiple TCRs against the HERC1 neoantigen which activate T cells in response to exposure to peptide-MHC I and kill cancer cells more effectively than a patient-derived TCR. In addition, we used generative AI to design functional TCRs that target the EGFR T790M neoantigen, engineering greater specificity against the mutant sequence. We present an AI-based approach to TCR design with broad utility for efforts to engineer TCRs and for the development of new cell therapies. One sentence summaryArtificial intelligence-based approach enables the directed engineering of functional TCRs with enhanced features that target cancer neoantigens.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.4%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.7%
3
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.4%
8
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
11
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.5%
16
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%