Magnitude and factors associated with missed Human Papillomavirus vaccination opportunities among adolescents in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Mtandika, M.; Kilindo, F. J.; Fransiscko, F.; Kapesa, A.; Namanya, B.; Matovelo, D.
Show abstract
Background: Tanzania introduced the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in 2018 for girls aged 9-14 years; however, coverage remains suboptimal. Missed opportunities (MOs) for vaccination are an important but understudied barrier, particularly in urban settings. This study assessed factors associated with MOs and explored healthcare providers perspectives on barriers and potential solutions in Dar es Salaam. Methods: An embedded mixed-methods study was conducted in public health facilities in Temeke Municipal Council from June - July 2025. The quantitative component involved a cross-sectional survey of 252 parents or caregivers of eligible adolescent girls using structured exit interviews. The qualitative component included in-depth interviews with 20 healthcare providers using a phenomenological approach. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with MOs. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarkes framework. Results: The prevalence of MOs for HPV vaccination was 71.4%. Factors independently associated with MOs included caregiver age [≥]40 years (aOR 1.87, 95% CI: 1.02-3.42), female caregiver gender (aOR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.00-2.59), primary education (aOR 2.14, 95% CI: 1.03-4.45), married status (aOR 1.72, 95% CI: 1.01-2.94), and receiving care at health centers or dispensaries versus hospitals (aOR 1.83, 95% CI: 1.05-3.19). Qualitative findings identified key drivers of MOs, including limited caregiver knowledge, vaccine hesitancy, time constraints, failure to routinely offer vaccination, stock-outs, poor documentation, high workload, and limited outreach. Proposed strategies included routine eligibility screening, reminder systems, community engagement, and supportive supervision. Conclusion: MOs for HPV vaccination are highly prevalent and driven by both caregiver and health system factors. Strengthening routine screening, reminder systems, community engagement, and supervision may improve vaccine uptake.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework 96%
- Policies and strategies for HPV vaccination schedule completion in immunocompromised girls, including girls living with HIV: Qualitative insights from Eswatini, Malawi, and Uganda 96%
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of vaccination card retention in Tamale Metropolis, Ghana 95%
- COVID-19 self-testing in Nigeria: Stakeholders’ opinions and perspective on its value for case detection 95%
- Implementation strategies to increase human papillomavirus vaccination uptake for adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A decade of Acceptability Research with Adolescents in Africa: Systematic review and evidence map 95%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 95%
- Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Utilization of Facility-Based Essential Maternal and Child Health Services in North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community Perceptions of Vaccination Among Influential Stakeholders: Qualitative Research in Rural India 96%
- Vaccine confidence and timeliness of childhood immunisation by health information source, maternal, socioeconomic, and geographic characteristics in Albania 94%
- Hair salons as a promising space to provide HIV and sexual and reproductive health services for young women in Lesotho: A citizen scientist mixed-methods study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.