Back

Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker-induced Prescribing Cascades: Signal Detection using High-throughput Sequence Symmetry Analysis

Kulkarni, P.; Ndai, A.; Keshwani, S.; Smith, K. M.; Choi, J.; Luvera, M.; Hunter, J.; Wright, S.; Hetzel, J.; Pepine, C. J.; Schmidt, S.; Morris, E.; Smith, S.

2026-05-20 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.15.26353346 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHP-CCB) are widely prescribed antihypertensives whose adverse effects may trigger unnecessary prescribing of additional medications, termed prescribing cascades (PC). We aimed to identify potential DHP-CCB-induced PCs using high-throughput sequence symmetry analysis (HTSSA). Methods: Using Medicare claims data (2011-2020), we identified new users aged [≥]66 years with continuous enrollment [≥]360 days before and [≥]180 days after DHP-CCB initiation. We screened for initiation of 446 "marker" drug classes within {+/-}90 days of DHP-CCB initiation. Sequence ratios compared marker drug initiation after versus before DHP-CCB initiation. Adjusted sequence ratios (aSR), accounting for prescribing trends over time, were calculated with 95% CIs >1 considered statistically significant. Clinical experts classified statistically significant signals as potential PCs through consensus. Results: Among 388,862 DHP-CCB initiators (mean age 76.6 {+/-} 7.5 years; 62.5% women, 92.3% with hypertension), 82 of 446 marker drug classes had significantly elevated aSRs, of which 24 were classified as potential PCs. Strongest signals ranked by highest aSR included other systemic hemostatics (aSR 2.99; 95% CI, 1.10-8.16), other nasal preparations (aSR 1.99; 95% CI, 1.47-2.70), and drugs used in erectile dysfunction (aSR 1.85; 95% CI, 1.27-2.70). Other clinically relevant signals, ranked by number needed to harm (lowest to highest), included sulfonamides (NNTH 104; 95% CI, 98-111), electrolyte solutions (NNTH 216; 95% CI, 196-241), and osmotically acting laxatives (NNTH 710; 95% CI, 540-1056). Conclusion: Potential PCs identified in this Medicare cohort reflected known and underrecognized adverse effects of DHP-CCBs. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical consequences of these PCs.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
2
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
5
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
6
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
8
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
11
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
17
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
20
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
22
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
23
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
24
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
26
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
27
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
28
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%