Back

Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker-induced Prescribing Cascades: Signal Detection using High-throughput Sequence Symmetry Analysis

Kulkarni, P.; Ndai, A.; Keshwani, S.; Smith, K. M.; Choi, J.; Luvera, M.; Hunter, J.; Wright, S.; Hetzel, J.; Pepine, C. J.; Schmidt, S.; Morris, E.; Smith, S.

2026-05-20 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.15.26353346 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHP-CCB) are widely prescribed antihypertensives whose adverse effects may trigger unnecessary prescribing of additional medications, termed prescribing cascades (PC). We aimed to identify potential DHP-CCB-induced PCs using high-throughput sequence symmetry analysis (HTSSA). Methods: Using Medicare claims data (2011-2020), we identified new users aged [≥]66 years with continuous enrollment [≥]360 days before and [≥]180 days after DHP-CCB initiation. We screened for initiation of 446 "marker" drug classes within {+/-}90 days of DHP-CCB initiation. Sequence ratios compared marker drug initiation after versus before DHP-CCB initiation. Adjusted sequence ratios (aSR), accounting for prescribing trends over time, were calculated with 95% CIs >1 considered statistically significant. Clinical experts classified statistically significant signals as potential PCs through consensus. Results: Among 388,862 DHP-CCB initiators (mean age 76.6 {+/-} 7.5 years; 62.5% women, 92.3% with hypertension), 82 of 446 marker drug classes had significantly elevated aSRs, of which 24 were classified as potential PCs. Strongest signals ranked by highest aSR included other systemic hemostatics (aSR 2.99; 95% CI, 1.10-8.16), other nasal preparations (aSR 1.99; 95% CI, 1.47-2.70), and drugs used in erectile dysfunction (aSR 1.85; 95% CI, 1.27-2.70). Other clinically relevant signals, ranked by number needed to harm (lowest to highest), included sulfonamides (NNTH 104; 95% CI, 98-111), electrolyte solutions (NNTH 216; 95% CI, 196-241), and osmotically acting laxatives (NNTH 710; 95% CI, 540-1056). Conclusion: Potential PCs identified in this Medicare cohort reflected known and underrecognized adverse effects of DHP-CCBs. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical consequences of these PCs.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
2
Drug Safety
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
4
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
5
Hypertension
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.4%
7
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
8
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
9
British Journal of General Practice
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.6%
11
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
12
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
13
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
14
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
15
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
16
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
17
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
18
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
21
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
22
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Journal of Hypertension
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
25
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
26
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
27
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
The Pharmacogenomics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
29
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
30
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%