Back

Fully Homomorphic Collaborative Learning for Safe Cross-Healthcare Institution Development and Implementation of Foundation Models

Bian, S.; Qiao, H.; Yan, T.; Xia, Z.; Gao, X.; Xu, Y.; Shen, R.; Ma, T.; Guan, Z.; Wang, Y. X.; Wong, T. Y.; Dai, Q.

2026-05-20 ophthalmology
10.64898/2026.05.15.26353345 medRxiv
Show abstract

Foundation models (FMs) are powerful tools to allow the broad clinical application of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare systems, offering adaptability to different disease, modalities and clinical settings. However, FMs require large-scale datasets to train and fine-tune, while most real-world data are localized in siloed healthcare settings with strict data privacy protection, a restriction that poses a fundamental challenge in the cross-healthcare institution development of FMs. Here, we develop a fully homomorphic collaborative learning framework, named as FOCAL, that enables secure FM-driven diagnosis without exposing raw patient information. Different from traditional federated learning (FL) frameworks that aggregate locally trained models, FOCAL integrates fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) with split training to effectively execute collaborative learning completely over encrypted data. Specifically, we apply FOCAL on different types of retinal and pathology FMs to demonstrate its clinical performance. When facing gradient inversion attacks, FOCAL reduced the data leakage rate from 90.6% to 0% with comparable accuracy performance of the state-of-the-art FL paradigms, owing to the provable security provided by FHE. Moreover, under the same level of security, FOCAL can boost the macro-average AUROC by nearly 50% (from 0.5202 to 0.9831) when evaluated against fully encrypted FL models. In the multi-institution comparative experiments, FOCAL consistently outperforms all single-institution FMs, improving AUROCs by 9.62% and 14.46% on the ocular disease diagnosis and severity classification, respectively. Lastly, external validations on both retinal and pathology FMs further verified the accuracy and security advantages of FOCAL and highlighted its reliable interpretability and generalizability for cross-institution clinical development and implementation of FMs. FOCAL is a novel method to build a secure data-sharing AI community, facilitating healthcare institutions to benefit from and contribute to next-generation FMs development without compromising patient privacy and data security.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
3
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
17.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.4%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
7
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
8
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
10
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
12
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
14
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
18
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
19
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
20
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
21
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
22
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
23
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%