Back

Predicting Intensive Care Readmission Among Hospitalized Children

Arshad, A.; Carey, K. A.; Daniels, L. A.; Jani, P.; Gilbert, E.; Sanchez-Pinto, L. N.; Mayampurath, A.

2026-05-19 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.05.15.26353330 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: Readmissions to the PICU are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A prediction model that can identify children at risk of readmission at the time of transfer can allow providers to intervene and potentially improve patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to derive and validate machine learning models to predict PICU readmission at the time of transfer. Design: Retrospective observational cohort study Setting: Three quaternary care PICUs in the city of Chicago Patients: All children admitted to the PICU between 2012 and 2019. Measurements: The primary outcome was unplanned readmission to the PICU within 48 hours of transfer to the inpatient ward. Predictor variables included vital signs, patient characteristics, and laboratory results. We developed and externally validated four models to predict PICU readmission: logistic regression, elastic net, random forest, and XGBoost. Main Results: This study included 35,601 patients, with readmission rates ranging from 2.2-3.7% by site. The performance of models during internal validation was consistent at the three sites, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) values between 0.70 and 0.73 and no difference across the four models. Model performance decreased significantly during external validation (AUCs of 0.60-0.69). The variables most important to the prediction differed at each site. Conclusion: Machine learning models for predicting readmissions to the PICU have limited generalizability. Locally derived models demonstrated modest performance in our study and could potentially inform provider decision-making if prospectively validated. Externally developed models are unlikely to perform well at predicting PICU readmissions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.2%
2
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
5
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
8
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%