Predicting Intensive Care Readmission Among Hospitalized Children
Arshad, A.; Carey, K. A.; Daniels, L. A.; Jani, P.; Gilbert, E.; Sanchez-Pinto, L. N.; Mayampurath, A.
Show abstract
Objective: Readmissions to the PICU are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A prediction model that can identify children at risk of readmission at the time of transfer can allow providers to intervene and potentially improve patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to derive and validate machine learning models to predict PICU readmission at the time of transfer. Design: Retrospective observational cohort study Setting: Three quaternary care PICUs in the city of Chicago Patients: All children admitted to the PICU between 2012 and 2019. Measurements: The primary outcome was unplanned readmission to the PICU within 48 hours of transfer to the inpatient ward. Predictor variables included vital signs, patient characteristics, and laboratory results. We developed and externally validated four models to predict PICU readmission: logistic regression, elastic net, random forest, and XGBoost. Main Results: This study included 35,601 patients, with readmission rates ranging from 2.2-3.7% by site. The performance of models during internal validation was consistent at the three sites, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) values between 0.70 and 0.73 and no difference across the four models. Model performance decreased significantly during external validation (AUCs of 0.60-0.69). The variables most important to the prediction differed at each site. Conclusion: Machine learning models for predicting readmissions to the PICU have limited generalizability. Locally derived models demonstrated modest performance in our study and could potentially inform provider decision-making if prospectively validated. Externally developed models are unlikely to perform well at predicting PICU readmissions.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a predictive model for critical illness in adult patients requiring hospitalization for COVID-19 95%
- Predicting patients with false negative SARS-CoV-2 testing at hospital admission: A retrospective multi-center study 95%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of automated computer aided-risk score for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality using first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs for COVID-19 hospital admissions: a retrospective development and validation study 95%
- Exploring Associations with Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in COVID-19 Patients upon Admission: A Model for Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in 329 Unvaccinated, Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients 94%
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictability and Stability Testing to Assess Clinical Decision Instrument Performance for Children After Blunt Torso Trauma 94%
- External validation of a paediatric SMART triage model for use in resource limited facilities 94%
- Identification of physiological adverse events using continuous vital signs monitoring during paediatric critical care transport: a novel data-driven approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of a pediatric telemedicine and medication delivery service in a resource-limited setting: A pilot study for clinical safety and feasibility 92%
- Inpatient Kangaroo Care Predicts Early Cognitive Development at 6 and 12 Months in Infants Born Very Preterm 91%
- Routine Early Antibiotic use in SymptOmatic preterm Neonates (REASON): a prospective randomized controlled trial. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.