Back

Differences in Family Dementia Caregiver Needs and Preferences Across the Lifespan

Gallagher, V.; Sheehan, C.; Manning, C.; Shaffer, K.

2026-05-21 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.15.26353316 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background The majority of family dementia caregivers in the United States (U.S.) are now young and middleaged adults. However, little research has been conducted to understand how caregiver needs and preferences for support differ depending on their phase of adulthood. This study evaluated differences in mental health, caregiving readiness, desired supports, and intervention preferences among early (<46 years), middle (46 to 60 years), and late (>60 years) adulthood dementia caregivers. Methods A cross sectional survey was conducted with 202 family dementia caregivers aged 22 to 88. Caregivers completed validated measures of burden, anxiety, depression, well being, time pressure, dementia knowledge, caregiving preparedness, and positive aspects of caregiving. Desired supports and preferences for intervention format, program type, and frequency were assessed. Analyses examined both categorical adulthood phase and continuous age associations with caregiver outcomes, with alpha thresholds of p<.05. Results Early adulthood caregivers self reported higher anxiety symptoms (relative to late adulthood caregivers) and perceived time pressure (relative to middle and late adulthood caregivers). Relative to late adulthood caregivers only, early adulthood caregivers more frequently endorsed desired support for supplemental care and safety tools for the person with dementia, as well as willingness to engage in individual counseling and automated, digital supports. Relative to both middle adulthood and late adulthood caregivers, they also more frequently expressed desired support for their own mental health. Conclusions Dementia caregiving in early adulthood is associated with distinct psychological and practical support needs, suggesting life course informed interventions may enhance relevance and engagement.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
16.1%
2
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.0%
3
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.8%
4
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.2%
6
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.2%
7
BMC Geriatrics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
8
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
9
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
11
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
12
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
13
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
16
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
npj Aging
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 81%
0.5%
26
Nature Aging
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%