Back

Differences in Family Dementia Caregiver Needs and Preferences Across the Lifespan

Gallagher, V.; Sheehan, C.; Manning, C.; Shaffer, K.

2026-05-21 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.15.26353316 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background The majority of family dementia caregivers in the United States (U.S.) are now young and middleaged adults. However, little research has been conducted to understand how caregiver needs and preferences for support differ depending on their phase of adulthood. This study evaluated differences in mental health, caregiving readiness, desired supports, and intervention preferences among early (<46 years), middle (46 to 60 years), and late (>60 years) adulthood dementia caregivers. Methods A cross sectional survey was conducted with 202 family dementia caregivers aged 22 to 88. Caregivers completed validated measures of burden, anxiety, depression, well being, time pressure, dementia knowledge, caregiving preparedness, and positive aspects of caregiving. Desired supports and preferences for intervention format, program type, and frequency were assessed. Analyses examined both categorical adulthood phase and continuous age associations with caregiver outcomes, with alpha thresholds of p<.05. Results Early adulthood caregivers self reported higher anxiety symptoms (relative to late adulthood caregivers) and perceived time pressure (relative to middle and late adulthood caregivers). Relative to late adulthood caregivers only, early adulthood caregivers more frequently endorsed desired support for supplemental care and safety tools for the person with dementia, as well as willingness to engage in individual counseling and automated, digital supports. Relative to both middle adulthood and late adulthood caregivers, they also more frequently expressed desired support for their own mental health. Conclusions Dementia caregiving in early adulthood is associated with distinct psychological and practical support needs, suggesting life course informed interventions may enhance relevance and engagement.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
3
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
10.6%
4
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
5
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
7
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.7%
8
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
9
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.0%
13
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
15
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
18
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
19
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
20
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
21
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
22
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%