Back

Glutamatergic neuron-tumor synapses shape human glioblastoma cell states through radial glia plasticity

Martija, A.; Bristow, B. N.; Rana, D.; Bollu, S.; Fazzari, E.; Baisiwala, S.; Nguyen, C. V.; Ge, W.; Kan, R. L.; Azizad, D. J.; Li, M. X.; Nano, P. R.; Cho, H.; Perryman, T.; Nathanson, D. A.; Patel, K. S.; Bhaduri, A.

2026-05-15 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.14.725216 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating primary brain tumor with remarkable inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity. GBM cells assume a spectrum of neurodevelopmental-like phenotypes and co-opt normal neurophysiological processes, which include synaptic integration with their neuronal microenvironment. This is mediated by neuron-tumor synapses (NTS) that predominantly involve glutamatergic receptors, which drive calcium elevations that promote tumor proliferation and invasion. The exact relationship between synaptic signaling and tumor cell fate specification, however, remains largely unexplored. Here, we develop and leverage a synapse-optimized human organoid tumor transplantation (so-HOTT) model of GBM to decipher how glutamatergic signaling impacts GBM lineage trajectories. so-HOTT preserves patient tumor heterogeneity, features excitatory NTS, and enables clonal lineage tracing of tumor cells after NTS perturbations. Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of AMPA and kainate receptors in so-HOTT shifts tumor cell composition from neuronal fates toward progenitor-proximal astrocytic/mesenchymal states. This occurs through the attenuation of calcium signaling and reduced plasticity of malignant radial glia (RG)-like progenitors, a previously unrecognized target of NTS. Through the integration of inputs from the neuronal microenvironment into glutamatergic signaling, progenitor populations modulate their transcriptional programs and cell fate, ultimately shaping GBM tumor heterogeneity. Targeting synaptic input may thus constrain the heterogeneity that fuels GBM adaptation and therapeutic escape.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.1%
2
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
4
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
5
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
6
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
8
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.5%
9
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.8%
11
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
12
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
13
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
14
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
15
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.0%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.9%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
18
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
22
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
23
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
24
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
26
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
27
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
30
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%