Back

Continuous negative autoregulation fine-tunes dosage-sensitive transcription factor expression to maintain post-mitotic neuron identity

Destain, H.; Koh, A.; Shin, H.; Brown, A.; Kratsios, P.

2026-05-15 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.05.14.725191 bioRxiv
Show abstract

How post-mitotic neurons maintain precise transcription factor (TF) levels throughout life remains a fundamental open question. Here, we challenge the prevailing model of positive autoregulation by demonstrating that UNC-3 (Collier/EBF1-4), a dosage-sensitive TF continuously required for cholinergic motor neuron identity in C. elegans, negatively regulates its own expression. Using genetics, biochemistry, and inducible protein depletion, we show this self-repression occurs directly at the transcriptional level and persists beyond development. CRISPR/Cas9 disruption of negative autoregulation causes motor neuron identity and locomotion defects, establishing its functional necessity. Mechanistically, the UNC-3 DNA-binding domain is required and sufficient for self-repression, with an AlphaFold2 screen implicating chromatin factors as interaction partners. Critically, UNC-3 self-repression is continuously counterbalanced by positive input from the HOX cofactor CEH-20/PBX, revealing a dynamic "balancing act" between opposing regulatory inputs that stabilize TF dosage over time. Mutations in the unc-3 ortholog EBF3 cause a neurodevelopmental syndrome, and disease-associated variants disrupt UNC-3 self-repression, revealing a key molecular mechanism underlying the disorder. We propose that negative autoregulation continuously counteracted by positive input represents a broadly applicable principle for maintaining dosage-sensitive TF expression to secure post-mitotic cell identity.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.