Back

How Demographic Noise Shapes Phenotypic Clusters in Environmental Gradients

Boutillon, N.; Fouqueau, L.

2026-05-16 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.14.725167 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1Although resources are typically distributed continuously in space, species distributions often organize into discrete clusters. In his seminal paper [36], Turing demonstrated that such clusters can spontaneously arise in population densities, even when populations evolve in environments with continuously varying conditions. This phenomenon is known as Turing instability. In this work, we focus on two models grounded in population dynamics: a one-dimensional model based on the nonlocal Fisher-KPP equation, and a two-dimensional model involving an environmental gradient. We show that phenotypic clusters (sometimes referred to as "species") emerge in these models. We prove that they do not emerge because of Turing instability, but because of stochasticity, and that they disappear when stochasticity is reduced. First, for both models, we start our simulations with initial populations uniformly distributed in the state space. We show that phenotypic clusters quickly emerge and that the distances between them depend on the population size, that is, on the degree of stochasticity. Next, we start from already clearly defined phenotypic clusters. We identify three regimes in the connection between population size, the initial distances between clusters, and the distances between clusters at equilibrium. Last, on the two-dimensional model, we relax the hypothesis of complete clonality by varying the effective recombination rate, explore its effect on phenotypic clustering, and show that phenotypic clustering decays drastically with slight recombination.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.1%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.7%
9
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
10
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
11
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
13
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
15
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.6%
17
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
20
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
24
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%