Back

A Root Foundation Model for Zero-Shot Segmentation

Smith, A. G.; Lamprinidis, S.; Wlaszczyk, A.; Petersen, J.

2026-05-18 plant biology
10.64898/2026.05.14.725129 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Foundation models pre-trained on massive datasets have demonstrated impressive performance, but in some specialised domains have been found to have lower accuracy. Domain-specific foundation models target a particular domain such as retinal or plant images. These domain-specific models have shown inconsistent results and the benefit to root segmentation is unknown. We train and evaluate the first domain-specific foundation model for root segmentation. Evaluation uses a leave-one-dataset-out design across nine diverse root datasets with two architectures. The domain-specific model segments unseen root datasets zero-shot (without any fine-tuning on the unseen dataset), achieving a mean Dice of 0.636 versus 0.698 for individually fine-tuned models, that is, 92% of fine-tuned Dice on average and above 90% for 5 of 9 datasets. We also test few-shot transfer learning. Fine-tuning on only 10 patches, the domain-specific model recovers 95% of its full-data Dice on average, versus 69% for a general pre-trained model. With full target-data fine-tuning, the two perform comparably, with mean improvements of +0.011 Dice for MobileSAM and +0.022 for M2F Swin-S, neither significant (Wilcoxon p = 0.150 and 0.064). We release our pre-trained MobileSAM root foundation model for use with RootPainter, enabling fully automatic root segmentation on new datasets with an ordinary laptop or desktop computer, with no need for annotation or training.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
25.9%
2
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
17.6%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
5
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
8
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
9
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
12
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
13
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
15
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
23
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%