Back

On the stock structure bias of the space-time fidelity of mark-recapture studies

Witting, L.

2026-05-14 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.14.725068 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mark-recapture analyses on the delineation of natural populations between areas often assume random sampling, with a between/within (B/W) area resighting ratio that declines towards zero as the population components of two areas become more-and-more isolated from one another, with fewer-and-fewer individuals mixing between areas. I use an individual based population model split in two areas to simulate this result, analysing also for the potential effects of the space-time fidelity of the mark-recapture sampling in the areas. I find that small B/W resighting ratios--that traditionally is taken as evidence of population isolation--can easily be observed within a completely mixing population if a random sampling scheme is restricted in space and/or time. Random sampling within restricted areas and time windows is not sufficient to estimate mixing rates and population isolation between areas, unless the resighting rates are analysed by a method that accounts both for the space-time fidelity of the scientific sampling scheme and the space-time fidelity of the distributional behaviour of the individuals in the population.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.3%
3
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
4
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
5
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
7
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.0%
10
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
11
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
13
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
15
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
17
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
18
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
21
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
26
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
28
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%